Search for: "Read v. United States" Results 3781 - 3800 of 30,054
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2014, 8:33 am
From the abstract: The Supreme Court’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 7:42 am by McLaughlin & Nardi, LLC
On June 27, 2018, the United States Supreme Court issued an important employment law decision in the case of Janus v. [read post]
Bonta”), the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit addressed whether the broad preemption language of the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 (“FAAAA”) precludes enforcement of California’s Assembly Bill 5 (“AB-5”) against motor carriers operating in California. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 11:59 am by James J. La Rocca
 The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit recently issued a similar decision in NLRB v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 1:04 am
On Saturday afternoon, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia ruled unconstitutional the District’s absolute prohibition on the carrying of handguns outside the home for lawful self-defense, in the case of Palmer v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 8:47 am by Noah Lapidus
United States, concerns the interpretation of the phrase “exceeds authorized access” under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA). [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 7:32 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Thousands of Whistleblowers At-Risk of Losing Protection WASHINGTON, DC – DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES, November 28, 2017 — The United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument today in a major precedent setting whistleblower case, Digital Realty Trust v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm by Michael Payne
In a recent decision issued by the United States Court of Federal Claims, Anthem Builders, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 11:25 am by Lisa Baird
In a decision with significant potential ramifications for flows of personal data from the European Union to the United States, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) handed down its judgment in Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner (Case C-362/14) that the Safe Harbor Decision no longer provides adequate protection for data transferred between the EU and the U.S. [read post]