Search for: "STATE V. POWERS"
Results 3781 - 3800
of 41,364
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2016, 11:00 pm
Hot Coffee Hot Coffee begins with the notorious Liebeck v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 5:34 pm
UPDATE: Ethan has pointed out that Saulic v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 2:37 pm
Partially tribal land: The case for limiting state eminent domain power under 25 USC 357. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 2:37 pm
Partially tribal land: The case for limiting state eminent domain power under 25 USC 357. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:37 pm
The Supreme Court will soon hear oral arguments in Sorrell v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 4:01 pm
United States. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:04 am
Trump v. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 12:01 am
In Worcester v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 9:14 am
As acknowledged by an opinion issued by the California Attorney General’s office, the Supreme Court’s decision in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:00 pm
In the event that extradition is denied on that basis, Article 3(2) requires the Requested State to submit the case to its competent authorities for the purpose of prosecution if the Requesting State so requests and if the laws of the Requested State so allow. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 5:00 am
It upheld the state's power to impose a nominal fine on an unvaccinated person. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 3:18 am
Contents include:2013 Lalive Lecture Alain Pellet, The Case Law of the ICJ in Investment ArbitrationCase CommentsWalid Ben Hamida, SAUR International SA c République argentine: Droit national, droit international et droits de l’homme : l’histoire d’un ménage à trois Irmgard Marboe, Quasar de Valores SICAV SA and others v The Russian Federation: Another Chapter of the Yucos Affair Julian Davis Mortenson, Quiborax SA et al v Plurinational… [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 4:30 am
Chochorowski, et al. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 5:22 am
State of M.P., AIR 1954 SC 465] and control of import and export [Bhatnagars & Co. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 6:31 am
This means that the Lord Advocate has no power to conduct extradition proceedings against the appellant, and the Scottish Ministers have no power to order his extradition, if those acts are incompatible with the appellant’s rights under the Convention. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 5:57 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Criminal Opinions Body: State v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 4:51 pm
It reallocates that power to the lower courts—who will decide which subset of cases—those [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 7:11 am
State v. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 3:17 pm
But Congress has that power, and the states (and their local government subdivisions) do not. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 12:04 pm
How would a federally-instituted voting scheme comport with notions of federal government powers in relation to state powers? [read post]
