Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp"
Results 3781 - 3800
of 4,115
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2008, 9:58 pm
Spitzer is horrified by the case that became DC v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 7:31 pm
See Farina v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 7:33 am
Co. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 8:33 pm
State v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 5:03 pm
ANPAC's motion for summary judgment was denied and a jury awarded damages to Wilmoth and Sharpe. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 7:43 pm
It's the difference between quoting a short and sharp political sermon versus trying to extract a useful quote from a set of stereo instructions. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 2:33 am
But, on Tuesday, one of its first new offerings encountered a sharp attack from lawyers for six of the detainees who won a Supreme Court ruling and the right to challenge their detention in federal court. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 12:48 am
Scott v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: Nine v IceTV: (International Law Office) Benelux Some new rules of the Director-General of the Benelux Organisation for Intellectual Property with regard to trade mark filings refused on absolute grounds and withdrawal of oppositions: (Class 46) Brazil Brazil exports agricultural technology to developing world: (IP tango) Canada Conservatives website faces claims of copyright infringement: (Michael Geist), Canada’s trade mark opposition practice… [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 5:15 am
The ambiguous and often tragic world of alleged and actual sex offenders - running the gamut from harmless experimentation and role-playing to sinister preying on defenseless victims - is brought into sharp relief in the Second Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 1:51 am
In PARFI HOLDING AB v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 1:51 am
In PARFI HOLDING AB v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 4:05 am
In sharp contrast, opposition to the Roe trimester test was widespread. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 2:37 am
This week’s Sixth Circuit ruling in Tucker v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 9:15 pm
Jackson v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 8:47 pm
In Ben-Yisrayl v. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 10:16 pm
216 Jamaica Avenue, LLC v. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 11:45 pm
See Dudnikov v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 11:09 pm
Supreme Court ruling in the case of Employment Division v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
