Search for: "Short v. United States" Results 3781 - 3800 of 10,137
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2021, 6:29 am by Florian Mueller
Albright of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas in the year 2020--19.5% of all U.S. patent cases filed that year, and more than three times as many as to Judge J. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:29 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
On April 15th, there is a chance for the United States Supreme Court to correct this genetic injustice and remove the limitations to our DNA. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 3:05 am by John A. Gallagher
"In contrast to other employment-related claims, recoveries made on claims relating to violations of the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”) may not be taxable income, at least in cases decided in the Federal District Court sitting in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.PENNSYLVANIA FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT SITTING IN PENNSYLVANIA DETERMINES THAT FMLA RECOVERIES ARE NOT TAXABLE AS W-2 INCOME Click Here to read how FMLA Leave and short-term disability benefits fit… [read post]
31 May 2024, 11:58 am by John Elwood
In an unusual move, the United States filed a brief supporting further review. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am by Wolfgang Demino
Banks have plenty of wiggle-room to adjust their business practices to changing regulatory realities.In short, the specters invoked by the industry are overblown. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:50 pm by Sheppard Mullin
On June 20, 2011, the United States Supreme Court released its widely-anticipated decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2021, 8:03 am by Ekow Yankah
United States – which the Supreme Court will hear on Tuesday in the final argument of its 2020-21 term – packs so many swirling issues of great importance into an absurdly little case, it can hardly be believed. [read post]
9 May 2007, 1:04 pm
Beezhold specifically prescribed a short course of a particular antibiotic-gentamicin-because it is nephrotoxic, or toxic to the kidneys. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 6:55 am by William C. Martinez
CVS Pharmacy, Inc., the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois denied CVS’s motion to dismiss, holding the plaintiffs sufficiently stated a claim under Section 15(b) of BIPA. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 6:55 am by William C. Martinez
CVS Pharmacy, Inc., the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois denied CVS’s motion to dismiss, holding the plaintiffs sufficiently stated a claim under Section 15(b) of BIPA. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 6:55 am by William C. Martinez
CVS Pharmacy, Inc., the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois denied CVS’s motion to dismiss, holding the plaintiffs sufficiently stated a claim under Section 15(b) of BIPA. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm by NL
The Court gave that short shrift In my judgment it was not appropriate to adjourn the hearing. [read post]