Search for: "State v. Battle" Results 3781 - 3800 of 7,531
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2015, 3:31 am by Eugene Kontorovich
United States, 171 F.2d 921, 936 (1st Cir.1948); United States v. al Liby, 23 F. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
And in situations like these, the Supreme Court has held, in a somewhat well-known 1977 case, Marks v. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 11:35 pm by Brian Frye
  In other words, it is entirely possible - depending on the court's understanding of its own opinion - that Graham won the battle, in order to lose the war. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 10:14 am by Robin Happel
Although seemingly a world away from the boardrooms where the battles over ESG adoption were playing out, this was, in hindsight, an early bellwether of things to come. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
They might have been allies in the political and legal battle against enforced conformity. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 4:00 am by Dianne Saxe
Massachusetts v EPA, 549 US 497 (2007); Comer v Murphy Oil USA, 839 F Supp (2d) 849 (SD Miss 2012); Native Village of Kivalina v ExxonMobil Corp, 696 F 3d 849 (9th Cir 2012). [4] Friends of the Earth v Canada (Governor in Council), 2008 FC 1184, aff’d 2009 FCA 297, leave to appeal to the SCC denied, [2009] SCCA 497. [5] Turp v Canada, 2012 FC 893. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:40 am by Marissa Miller
At the WSJ Law Blog, Joe Palazzolo reports that Paul Clement has advised corporate counsel to pay close attention to the outcome of United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 9:27 am by Lyle Denniston
Abbott, grew out of the court battle over redistricting of the Texas state senate following the 2010 census. ** The Court declined, in the case of McDonough v. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 7:59 am
Wisconsin, for example, is currently battling over a proposed Assembly bill that would change a state law which allows motorists to sue local governments for damages caused by road hazards without having to prove negligence, but requires proof of negligence in similar suits against the State. [read post]