Search for: "State v. Law"
Results 3781 - 3800
of 173,806
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2009, 11:27 pm
United States (sustaining independent regulatory commissions) and Morrison v. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 3:26 pm
It also distinguished other recent decisions involving state law claims based on COPPA violations, including In re Nickelodeon Consumer Privacy Litigation, Manigault-Johnson v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
If a State Department’s policy memorandum constitutes a "rule or regulation" within the meaning of the State’s Constitution it must be filed with the Secretary of State before it can have the force and effect of lawPlainview-Old Bethpage Congress of Teachers v New York State Health Ins. [read post]
24 May 2017, 1:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 1:33 pm
United States (Quiet Title Act) Mestek v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:02 pm
Kelly v State of New York 2022 NY Slip Op 03952 Decided on June 16, 2022 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:02 pm
Kelly v State of New York 2022 NY Slip Op 03952 Decided on June 16, 2022 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 9:00 pm
We will keep this chart up-to-date as we receive new information. 2014 legislation proposed in 16 states and laws enacted in 5 states. [read post]
20 Jan 2013, 2:09 am
United States on November 1st 2012. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 12:24 pm
Constitution guarantees that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 3:42 am
Franklin and State v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 2:14 pm
Schwartz Professor of Law at the UCLA School of Law. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 12:42 pm
Schnell (Religious Freedom) United States of America v. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 6:07 am
State v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 10:22 am
On appeal, the Second Circuit held that summary judgment had been improperly granted based on the penal law rule, however, it also held that because Brazil was seeking assistance from the United States Attorney General in enforcing its forfeiture judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2467, the District Court should allow Brazil and the Attorney General time to complete this process before taking further action in the case.The decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 8:13 am
Supreme Court decision in Bostock v. [read post]
15 Feb 2020, 4:39 pm
Chatterjee v CBS, 6:19-CV-212-REW United States District Court, E.D. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 7:43 am
On March 18, 2013, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Arizona v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 12:29 pm
On January 14, 2014, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Executive Benefits Insurance Agency v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 12:29 pm
On January 14, 2014, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Executive Benefits Insurance Agency v. [read post]
