Search for: "State v. Maker" Results 3781 - 3800 of 4,684
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2016, 5:00 am by Jonathan H. Adler
While raising the formal bar for filing many lawsuits, upholding broad arbitration clauses, and rejecting new avenues of class-action litigation against large corporations,  the Court has also refused to preempt litigation against drug makers or block state immigration laws penalizing businesses that hire undocumented workers, and unleashed the federal regulation of greenhouse gases by the U.S. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 2:10 am by Florian Mueller
At least one Android device maker delivered it prior to Apple, and others will deliver it soon. [read post]
16 May 2020, 12:23 am by Ralf Michaels
But it is perhaps even more important for decision makers to be aware of both the pitfalls and the potentials of conflicts of law. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 10:00 am by Prerna Tara
This contradicts with the concept of exercising reproductive rights as guaranteed as mentioned in Roe v. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:19 am
 Because [Joey] Langston was awarded state contracts by Hood to sue prescription drug-maker Eli Lilly and MCI, Hood said he could not prosecute him. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
: (Patent Docs), Generic drug developers will continue to take advantage of global demand for lower-priced drugs, with Teva poised to maintain lead position says Goldman Sachs analyst: (GenericsWeb), Daiichi Sankyo takeover of Ranbaxy: (Profitability through Simplicity), (Spicy IP), (GenericsWeb), Canada: Generics to penetrate 26% pharma market in Canada says RNCOS research: (GenericsWeb), Canada: Generic drug makers spreading misinformation about patent regulation amendments to dodge real… [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
Family law is often framed as different or unique by policy makers. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 3:54 pm by Michael Abramowicz
The maker of remdesivir received orphan drug status for the drug (and thus exclusivity and other benefits) on the ground that it met the statutory definition of a rare disease, based on the number of people currently suffering from COVID-19 in the United States. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 4:21 am by Miquel Montañá
This view was rejected by the WTO Dispute Settlement Body in its panel of 17 March 2000 (EC v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 9:30 pm by Craig N. Oren
The five Justices who voted to grant the stay are the same justices who voted for the Court’s decision last spring in Michigan v. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 4:47 am by Dennis Crouch
For that point, the brief sites Seymour v. [read post]