Search for: "State v. Marks" Results 3781 - 3800 of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2007, 6:17 am
Hanlon, 401 F.3d 926, 929 (8th Cir. 2005) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 12:30 pm
"He also commented that in Interflora 1 (Interflora Inc v Marks and Spencer plc [2012] EWCA Civ 1501 [noted by the IPKat here] Lewison L.J. had stated that different considerations from the general position on surveys apply where the issue is whether a registered mark has acquired distinctiveness. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 9:00 am by Eric Goldman
Considering that the marks used by the Defendant are identical to the AUDI Trademarks, initial-interest confusion is likely. * Dish Network LLC v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 3:15 pm
And Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg issued the opinion of the Court in United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 2:41 am by war
International Hair Cosmetics Group Pty Ltd v International Hair Cosmetics Limited [2011] FCA 339 [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Supreme Court's use of history (and various reflections on the use of history in judicial decisionmaking) in the recently decided Second Amendment case United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 11:02 pm
Name data are from Social Security card applications for births that occurred in the United States. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 3:16 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
New York marks the fifth state in a row in which marriage equality has been achieved legislatively rather than through state court intervention: soon after Varnum v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 4:01 pm
  The basic right to a jury in a criminal case had been extended to the states 11 years earlier, in the 1968 decision in Duncan v. [read post]