Search for: "State v. Minor"
Results 3781 - 3800
of 16,402
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2020, 10:52 am
Anderson v City of San Jose, 2019 WL 6317875 (CA App. 11/26/2019) [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 10:37 am
In D.C. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 6:46 am
[Whereas in the Katy Perry case, for example, the crux of the similarity was a descending minor mode 8 figure ostinato, also found in Bach’s Violin Sonata in F Minor, Hammerstien’s Ol Man River, and even, according to the defence, Mary Had A Little Lamb.] [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:00 am
Robert V. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
Like all states, Texas is subject to ¶2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA), which is violated when a state districting plan provides “less opportunity for racial minorities “to elect representatives of their choice,” League of United Latin American Citizens v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
Like all states, Texas is subject to ¶2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA), which is violated when a state districting plan provides “less opportunity for racial minorities “to elect representatives of their choice,” League of United Latin American Citizens v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 6:48 pm
Adams v. [read post]
2 Jun 2007, 8:39 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 8:57 am
") AC31801 - Brown v. [read post]
4 May 2008, 3:04 pm
(And remember that a sizable minority in the Princeton v MDS case found even commercial copying to be ok.) [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 11:10 pm
All of this would equally apply to a contingency at the State level, like the one which V Venkatesan points out. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 11:21 am
Passing these problems off as minor, with unserious consequences for voters, can make it easier for Georgia to convince the court that it should not intervene. [read post]
31 May 2006, 6:06 am
State v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 11:41 am
United States, Smith v. [read post]
12 Sep 2020, 8:55 am
” Thus, like Yang v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:01 am
In turn, this entails that, as Lord Mustill stated in In re D (Minors) (Adoption Reports: Confidentiality) [1996] AC 593, “each party to a judicial process should have an opportunity to answer by evidence and argument any adverse material which the tribunal make take into account when forming its opinion”. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 8:24 am
State v. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 12:35 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 5:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 1:49 pm
"The Constitution does not permit states to pass overbroad and vague statutes that threaten protected speech. [read post]
