Search for: "State v. Plan" Results 3781 - 3800 of 29,605
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2014, 2:02 pm
Last May, Susan Foreman Jordan in our Pittsburgh office issued a very informative alert on the impact of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
She brings this suit along with Planned Parenthood South Atlantic (PPSAT) against the state because of its alleged ambiguous language in  Senate Bill 474 (SB 474), also known as the Fetal Heartbeat and Protection from Abortion Act. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
CSEA's members and former members may obtain health insurance through the New York State Health Insurance Plan (NYSHIP), an optional health-benefit plan covering current and retired state employees and other public employees. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
CSEA's members and former members may obtain health insurance through the New York State Health Insurance Plan (NYSHIP), an optional health-benefit plan covering current and retired state employees and other public employees. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 1:32 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 1:40 am by mtpham2@illinois.edu
In the United States, the most recent attempt to balance business interests and consumer concerns has come from California, in the form of the California Consumer Protection Act (the “CCPA,” or the “Act”), which went into effect January 1, 2020.[1]  The Act has created a seemingly robust set of rights for consumers to know what information businesses have about them, what is being done with that information, and how they may request to delete such… [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 10:24 pm by Patricia Salkin
Pulte Home Corporation v Montgomery County, Maryland, 2015 WL 4430588 (D. [read post]
8 May 2012, 5:16 pm
On April 23, 2012, the United States Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral argument in RadLAX Gateway Hotel v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 9:43 am by Cooper, Adel & Associates
Courts have repeatedly held that the law permits this planning, but the state continues to refuse to acknowledge this. [read post]