Search for: "State v. Register"
Results 3781 - 3800
of 13,696
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2011, 8:30 am
("CA Appeals Court: Claims Under State Spam Statute Not Preempted by CAN-SPAM - Hypertouch v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 2:00 am
” In the case of Caldwell v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 1:12 pm
The specific issue before the Court is “[w]hether the refusal to register a trademark under 15 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 3:58 pm
By James V. [read post]
22 May 2014, 8:40 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Larry Klein v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 4:41 pm
United States, 131 S. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:51 am
Wonderbread 5 v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 2:50 am
’Advocate General Advocate General Pedro Cruz Villalon advised the CJEU to answer all these questions quite simply: ‘Where conduct occurs via the internet which is liable to infringe a national trade mark registered in a Member State, Article 5(3) of Regulation No 44/2001 must be interpreted as meaning that it attributes jurisdiction: – to the courts of the Member State in which the trade mark is registered – and to the courts of the… [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 5:46 am
I wonder if these folks have heard of Chicago V. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 2:43 am
There, the CAFC rejected the "reasonable manner" approach:Neither Phillips nor any other opinion of the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals, our predecessor court, or this court has endorsed the T.T.A.B. [read post]
29 Oct 2006, 12:09 pm
Goya Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 6:39 am
” In Effects Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 3:30 am
See Anheuser-Busch, LLC v. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 12:25 pm
Islam & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v London Borough of Haringey (2022) EWHC 3933 (Admin) This was a judicial review of Haringey’s refusal to award Mr Islam Band A priority on its housing register, rather than Band B. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 3:00 am
Benko v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
Today’s case of the day, Cutting Edge Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 1:02 pm
For example, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Martinez v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:53 am
After conducting a survey of the classifications used in the authorities including Campbell v MGN [2004] AC 457, Douglas v Hello! [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 7:41 am
State governments were supposed to serve as “laborator[ies]” of democracy, New State Ice Co. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 12:36 am
Thus, Dr Mattu’s position, as a registered consultant, was distinguished from the position of the trainee doctor in Kulkarni v Milton Keynes Hospital NHS Trust [2009] ICR 101, who could not complete his training in the private sector and whose dismissal would (in the obiter view of Smith LJ) have engaged Article 6 and its safeguards. [read post]
