Search for: "State v. Self" Results 3781 - 3800 of 15,821
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2020, 2:07 pm by Jillian de Chavez-Lau
PUA expands unemployment benefit coverage to certain workers who are usually not eligible for unemployment benefits under state law, including those who: are self-employed (including independent contractors and gig economy workers); are seeking part-time employment; are lacking sufficient work history; otherwise do not qualify for regular unemployment compensation under state or federal law, or PEUC; and have exhausted their unemployment benefits under state or… [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 4:41 pm
  The first is the filing of a lawsuit in federal court by the Governor of Missouri against the People's Republic of China, the Chinese Communist Party and other organs (Missouri v, People's Republic of China). [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 2:04 pm by Comunicaciones_MJ
… Madison, going beyond the recommendations of the states and the constitution of his own state, phrased his own proposal to make it coextensive with the broadest practice.[3] Los originalistas pretendieron que el derecho a no incriminarse ostentara la misma importancia que otros derechos fundamentales consagrados en la Constitución. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 2:51 pm
  The state can surely respond to that by charging Mr. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 9:23 am by Arthur F. Coon
  In Friends of Eel River (my July 31, 2017 post on which can be found here), the Supreme Court held that another federal law – the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act of 1995 (“ICCTA”) – does not preempt CEQA’s application to a railroad project undertaken by a state public entity on a rail line also owned by that state entity; it reasoned that even though a state’s imposition of environmental regulations like CEQA on a… [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Just as importantly, perhaps, states perturbed by the undoubtedly correct decision by the Supreme Court in Chisholm v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 3:26 am by CMS
Alaina Wadsworth, Chris Horsefield and Ben Brown, who all work within the Insurance & Reinsurance Group at CMS, comment on the decision handed down by the UK Supreme Court earlier this month, in the matter of Barclays Bank Plc v Various Claimants [2020] UKSC 13: Earlier this month, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in the matter of Barclays Bank plc v Various Claimants [2020] UKSC 13. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
The Independent reports that US self help guru Tony Robbins has sued Twitter for libel in Ireland. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 5:54 pm by Russell Knight
The problem with the self-exclusion list is that self-exclusion lists are permanent and a divorce court doesn’t have the authority to enter permanent orders via temporary relief. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 8:45 am by Casey Quinlan
Lack of regulation by court officers led others to take matters into their own hands (Casey Quinlan) Early in the morning on December 2, 2019, a line had formed outside the Supreme Court for oral argument in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Nonetheless, the ERA did not achieve 38 ratifications, or three-fourths of the states as required by Article V, by the extended deadline in 1982. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 3:49 am by Edith Roberts
At The Fire, Ronald Collins urges the court to review Waronker v. [read post]