Search for: "State v. Seven" Results 3781 - 3800 of 11,115
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2017, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
” The complaint’s stated purpose for inspection relating to previously dismissed claims for management and acquisition fees “does not constitute a proper purpose. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 12:45 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
”  That was enough to show standing, as required by Spokeo v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am by INFORRM
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (2017 SCC 34). [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 6:00 am by Colby Pastre
A further seven states unhelpfully said their answers cannot be relied upon as guidance by taxpayers (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Massachusetts, and New Mexico). [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 1:56 am by Liz Williams
  He says that is not something on which there is a margin of appreciation to the state. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 11:36 am by Robert Chesney
(v) Capabilities have been established to train cyber operations personnel, test cyber capabilities, and rehearse cyber missions. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:00 am by Jane Chong
What unfolded was an exhausting, seven-year public spectacle that proved to be (with one exception) impeachment’s last hurrah in the British Isles. [read post]