Search for: "State v. So " Results 3781 - 3800 of 117,850
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2010, 11:40 am by Dennis Crouch
Indeed, as of October 1, 2009 it was 897, so the reductions continue. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 7:28 am by Ben Henriques, Corker Binning
In brief, the case of R v Egan [1992] 4 All ER 470 had stated (without the court having heard full argument) that the previous case of R v Lloyd [1967] 1 QB 175 legitimised two approaches to defining ‘substantial’ in the context of diminished responsibility. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 11:41 am
I'm not really feeling it here.Melanie Williams and Demontheses Halcoussis are professors at Cal State Northridge. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 6:49 am
State, 18 So.3d 1246, 1247 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (citing State v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 11:40 am by admin
If so, the arm-of-state analysis might go the other way. [read post]
7 Oct 2023, 6:21 am by Kalvis Golde
Wayfair involved South Dakota’s effort to do so by taxing e-commerce sales. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 4:38 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Nevertheless, plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment on the account stated claim cannot be granted as to the other amounts billed, because plaintiff has not demonstrated entitlement to dismissal of defendant’s legal malpractice counterclaims, which are sufficiently intertwined with the account stated claim so as to provide a bona fide defense (see Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady, LLP v Rose, 111 AD3d 453, 454 [1st Dept… [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 7:01 am by david
Texas tells the story of the case, 539 U.S. 558 (2003), that struck down remaining state laws that criminalized consensual same-sex sexual activity and overturned Bowers v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 1:08 pm by Alfred Brophy
Although lower courts have adopted a categorical approach to speech tort liability, the Supreme Court has never done so. [read post]