Search for: "Still v. Justice Court"
Results 3781 - 3800
of 20,324
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2019, 8:33 am
FMI’s position has the likely support of Justice Clarence Thomas, who in 2015 advocated for the court to review and overturn the National Parks test in his dissent from a denial of certiorari in New Hampshire Right to Life v. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 9:28 pm
There the court refused to apply Padilla v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 3:14 am
Following GW Lawprof Jonathan Turley's posting of his Washington Post op-ed on changing the number of Supreme Court Justices, an idea that was further discussed here, a peculiar thing happened. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 12:10 pm
On September 9, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 8:03 am
The decision in Coleman v. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 8:08 pm
In Rales v. [read post]
15 Nov 2024, 6:41 am
What’s still left out: CAAF’s judges (but not CAAF itself) have contempt power under Article 48 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 10:32 pm
There are also still plenty of other IP cases in the pipeline, such as Lenz v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 9:12 am
Appeals courts can still dismiss cases that don’t fall under one of these defined areas of privilege. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 7:34 am
The case, United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2006, 6:00 am
Yesterday, in Konig v. [read post]
18 May 2017, 7:15 am
Commentators and bloggers about the court still refer to the tradition. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:19 am
I think it's still highly likely that the Court will rule against Harvard and UNC. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 8:26 am
Those are Justice Antonin Scalia’s words, taken from Monday’s eye-opening dissent in Maryland v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 7:57 am
(Supreme Court 2009, 08-964) As stated by Justice Kennedy in the opinion of the Court, the question in this case turned on whether a patent can be issued for a claimed invention designed for the business world. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 10:09 am
AlMastry AlYoum reports that while the head of the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces said that arrested protesters will not be tried in military courts, the Justice Minister clarified that those crimes which took place in “the military domain” still fall under their jurisdiction. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 1:20 pm
Because of budget cuts, the Chief Justice last month announced the court would not hear arguments in Los Angeles in June 2013. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 3:44 am
Furthermore, as discussed below, in attempting to reconcile G 2/21 with the Supreme Court decision in Warner-Lambert, Lord Justice Arnold (Arnold LJ) in Sandoz v BMS is forced to disagree with the interpretation that G 2/21 supports the established "lack of ab initio implausibility" standard. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 3:10 pm
Two weeks ago, in Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 11:41 pm
Antony v. [read post]
