Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 3781 - 3800
of 4,765
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2015, 10:47 am
In The Author’s Guild v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 8:25 am
It didn’t. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 8:25 am
E1756).During the mark-up, Rep. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
The model of post-rupture economic relations is only slowly emerging, but beyond the small scale and low level consumer markets, it is likely to be dominated by state gatekeeping in the form of applications, approvals, accountability and monitoring mechanisms. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 10:02 pm
Hearn, attorney from the Consumer Protection Branch of the U.S. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 9:03 pm
Call us today to set up an appointment so you can look forward to gaining the peace of mind that comes with knowing you have put a plan in place that protects you and your loved ones. [1] New FTC Data Show Consumers Reported Losing Nearly $8.8 Billion to Scams in 2022, Fed. [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:17 pm
There have been times when I found myself smitten by her common sense and consumer oriented bent, and others when I wanted to accuse her of being buried halfway up Geithner’s butt as a result of him stopping abruptly while walking the halls of the Treasury building. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 11:46 am
District Court case, Andrews v. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 11:25 pm
” See FTC v. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 11:36 am
That exception doesn’t apply here because “the School Districts are not individual consumers of Defendants’ platforms who need special protections but are not protected by contract. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
Colombia Colombian trade marks just got a little slower (IP tango) Croatia Simplified process for renewing customs watch applications, from 1 January 2009 (Class 46) Europe European Court of Justice rules on genuine use in Austrian charity reference: Verein Radetzky-Orden v Bundesvereinigung Kameradschaft ‘Feldmarschall Radetzky’ (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI decides BARBARA BECKER confusingly similar to earlier Community trade mark BECKER… [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 8:24 am
In Smith v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 5:15 am
Powers v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 8:42 am
” Dias v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 8:19 am
Even if it doesn’t end up going anywhere, just this particular court packing scheme is bad enough to shoot down. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
Maybe somebody was drunk when they came up with this, except that leads us to the new prohibition. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
The State courts and legislatures The first is the decision of the United States Supreme Court in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:25 am
– $145,000 Wickstrom v. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 8:20 am
What the IPKat says: please don't take this as a reflection of anything that the IPKat might be doing in his spare time, but he was particularly interested in the two contributions on paternity rights. [read post]
