Search for: "TAYLOR v TAYLOR"
Results 3781 - 3800
of 4,751
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2010, 9:02 am
Supreme Court heard arguments on Wednesday in the case of Samantar v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 3:25 am
Taylor, 2010 U.S. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 2:31 am
MUNROE v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 7:54 am
Agency’s initial decision sustaining an employee’s out-of-title work grievance overturned by the Governor’s Office Of Employee RelationsMatter of Cushing v Governor's Off. of Empl. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:31 am
2010-1151 Taylor Brands v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm
Today I am testifying at an FCC hearing on “Serving the Public Interest in the Digital Era. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:44 pm
Indus., Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 9:06 am
: how the case of Boy Scouts of America v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 9:21 am
(See Lescailles v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 4:00 am
Tremblay, The Bouchard-Taylor Report on Cultural and Religious Accommodation: Multiculturalism by Any Other Name? [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 8:03 am
Taylor, 545 N.E.2d 599 (Ind.Ct.App.1989). [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 6:40 am
” David Luban critiqued Taylor’s article at Balkinization. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 11:15 am
Indeed, the colloquial "water torture" references in U.S. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 3:15 pm
Taylor, for appellee. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 6:50 pm
In Thaler v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 1:26 pm
In Taylor v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:42 am
" The significance of this provision is that no "pre-termination hearing" that may otherwise be mandated by law such as Section 75 of the Civil Service Law or a Taylor Law disciplinary grievance procedure is required to effect the termination.As the plea of guilty or nolo contender* has the same effect as a conviction, Section 30.1(e) of the Public Officers Law is operative respect to declaring the position vacant in the event the public enters such a plea with respect to… [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 10:43 pm
In today’s case (Peters v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 2:26 am
Union’s right to demand and obtain documents on file with the employer in a grievance procedure does not extend to disciplinary actionsMatter of Pfau v Public Empl. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 12:54 am
The Appellate Division decided that Taylor's dismissal was improper because Taylor was not terminated for the sole reason specified in the settlement: intoxication on the job. [read post]
