Search for: "United States v. Choice" Results 3781 - 3800 of 6,476
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2024, 3:43 pm by Shane Pennington
United States Department of Labor continued the Fifth Circuit’s exploration of agency authority under Loper Bright. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 7:28 pm by Ryan
Wrotnowski was a challenge to Barack Obama’s qualifications to serve as President of the United States. [read post]
7 Apr 2025, 10:33 am by Dr. Adam Feldman
United States (2022) addressed financial penalties for failing to report foreign bank accounts. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Mark Graber
The PEW Research Group’s surveys of public opinion in the United States document the fundamental regime change that has taken place over the last half century. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 12:43 am by Florian Mueller
Apple, the App Store antitrust case that the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit will hear in 2 1/2 weeks.I discussed Epic v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:20 pm by Phil Dixon
Short-form indictments for statutory sex offense and indecent liberties using identical language for each charge and joined for trial were not defective State v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:41 pm by Lyle Denniston
Kennedy Institute for the United States Senate, only thirty-nine percent of those surveyed could explain that the Senate is assigned the role of advising and consenting to new Supreme Court nominees. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 9:57 am by Zneimer & Zneimer, P.C.
  For example, an alien that receives 2 of the benefits below for 6 months would be considered a public charge: (1) Any Federal, State, local, or tribal cash assistance for income maintenance (other than tax credits), including: (i) Supplemental Security Income; (ii) Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) ;or (iii) Federal, State or local cash benefit programs for income maintenance (often called “General Assistance” in the State context, but which… [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 11:28 am
Regulatory hegemony becomes important in that context, and hegemony for the purpose of preserving the solidity and position of States within complex clusters of human collectives may be served virtually through regulation platforms that serve as a united front. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm by John Elwood
United States, 13-10639 (third relist), asks whether the Eleventh Circuit’s appellate procedural default rule – categorically prohibiting consideration of issues not raised in an appellant’s opening brief – conflicts with the retroactivity rule set out in Griffith v. [read post]