Search for: "Voter v. Voter" Results 3781 - 3800 of 6,839
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2013, 9:02 am by Lyle Denniston
Inter Tribal Council of Arizona – constitutionality of requiring voters to prove U.S. citizenship in order to register to vote and cast ballots 11-1518 — Bullock v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:51 pm by Ilya Somin
However, Stevens did apparently worry that he might lose the support of key swing voter Justice Anthony Kennedy. [read post]
17 May 2016, 3:59 am by Amy Howe
 Other coverage of yesterday’s ruling in Zubik v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 7:04 am by Maria Kendrick
By Maria Kendrick The much awaited High Court judgment of 3 November 20161)R Miller v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin). was an historical decision which saw the Executive’s use of prerogative powers delineated in the context of Treaty making, and unmaking, in a successful Judicial Review against the Government. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 9:55 am by David Post
Gill, as most of you are probably aware, involves a challenge to the Republican-dominated Wisconsin legislature’s 2011 redistricting map, a map that, according to the three-judge panel below, was both intended to, and did, systematically disadvantage Democratic voters and advantage Republican voters across the state. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 10:00 pm by Michael
Part I: Introduction Part II: Circuit Judges Part III: County Judges Part IV: School Board, District 6 (today) Part V: Miami-Dade County Charter Amendments [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 8:35 am
(AP Photo/Susan Walsh) Earlier this morning, the Supreme Court chose to hear Fisher v. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 1:01 am by Frank Cranmer
In Muhammed Afzal v Ayoub Khan & Ors [2023] EWHC 376 (KB), His Honour Judge  Foster, sitting as election commissioner, was ruling on a petition by Labour candidate Muhammed Afzal to overturn the result of a local election in Birmingham in May 2022. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 9:06 pm by Alfred Brophy
 Is this part of making the decision more acceptable to Oklahoma voters? [read post]