Search for: "Will Thomas" Results 3781 - 3800 of 66,687
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
FOS publishes speech: What does the Consumer Duty mean for resolving financial complaints
28 Jun 2023, 8:48 am by Matthew Gregory (UK)
In her speech, Ms Thomas made the following points: The FOS does not expect that the CD will significantly change the way the FOS looks at complaints. [read post]
Regulation tomorrow - http://www.regulationtomorrow.com/
Severe Leg Injury: Verdicts Statistics
28 Jun 2023, 8:36 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Thomas v. [read post]
Maryland Injury Lawyer Blog - http://www.marylandinjurylawyerblog.com/
Kahn on Whether Holocaust Denial Laws and CRT Bans Are the Same @USTLawMN
28 Jun 2023, 8:21 am by Media Law Prof
Thomas (Minnesota) Legal Studies Research Paper No. 23-10. [read post]
Media Law Prof Blog - https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/media_law_prof_blog/
The U.S. Supreme Court Creates a Problem it Sought to Solve
28 Jun 2023, 8:01 am by Mark Ashton
Barrett and Thomas dissented. [read post]
Pennsylvania Family Law - http://pafamilylaw.foxrothschild.com/
The American Law Institute A Centennial History
28 Jun 2023, 7:17 am by Emmanuel Didier
GoldbergChapter 9: The Restatement of Property: The Curse of Incompleteness, Thomas W. [read post]
Juris Diversitas - http://jurisdiversitas.blogspot.com/
EU Fiscal Federalism Past, Present, Future
28 Jun 2023, 6:55 am by Emmanuel Didier
The ECB and the Courts, Alicia HinarejosEpilogue: Democratizing Fiscal Europe, Thomas Piketty and Antoine Vauchez [read post]
Juris Diversitas - http://jurisdiversitas.blogspot.com/
Calabritto, "Murder and Madness on Trial: A Tale of True Crime from Early Modern Bologna"
28 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Karen Tani
”—Thomas V. [read post]
Legal History Blog - http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/
U.S. Supreme Court Renders Personal Jurisdiction Decision
28 Jun 2023, 5:32 am by John Coyle
As I discussed in a preview of the Mallory decision, Gorsuch and Thomas in that case found the balancing approach required by the dormant Commerce Clause jurisprudence to simply be infeasible. [read post]
Conflict of Laws .net - https://conflictoflaws.net
"The decision merely says that 'state courts do not have free rein' and that they may not 'transgress the ordinary bounds of judicial review...'"
28 Jun 2023, 5:08 am
 Chief Justice Rehnquist, joined in a concurring opinion by JUSTICE THOMAS and Justice Scalia, acknowledged the usual deference we afford state court interpretations of state law, but noted “areas in which the Constitution requires this Court to undertake an independent, if still deferential, analysis of state law. [read post]
Althouse - https://althouse.blogspot.com
U.S. Supreme Court Expands Scope of the False Claims Act, Includes What Provider Believed When It Submitted the Claim
28 Jun 2023, 5:00 am by Wachler & Associates, P.C.
Thomas Proctor v. [read post]
Wachler & Associates Health Law Blog - http://www.wachlerblog.com/
Early Edition: June 28, 2023
28 Jun 2023, 1:46 am by Seán Binder
Cassandra Vinograd and Thomas Gibbons-Neff report for the New York Times. [read post]
Just Security - https://www.justsecurity.org/
[Josh Blackman] What Is The Effect Of The "Judgment" From Harper I?
27 Jun 2023, 10:04 pm by Josh Blackman
Roberts has no response to Justice Thomas on this foundational point. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Kuehn, "Patrimony and Law in Renaissance Italy"
27 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Cambridge University Press has published Patrimony and Law in Renaissance Italy (2022), by Thomas Kuehn (Clemson University). [read post]
Legal History Blog - http://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com/
Shany on Peaceful Assembly
27 Jun 2023, 8:55 pm by Lawrence Solum
Yuval Shany (Hebrew University of Jerusalem - Faculty of Law and Institute of Criminology; Israel Democracy Institute) has posted The Definition of Peaceful Assembly (Oxford Handbook of Peaceful Assembly, edited by Tabatha Abu El-Haj, Michael Hamilton, Thomas Probert and Sharath Srinivasan (2023, Forthcoming)) on SSRN. [read post]
Legal Theory Blog - https://lsolum.typepad.com/legaltheory/
What is a Service Mark?
27 Jun 2023, 7:21 pm by thomasgalvani
first appeared on Thomas W Galvani, PC. [read post]
BlogIP - Galvani Legal's Blo - http://www.galvanilegal.com/blog
The Supreme Court’s Elections Muddle - WSJ
27 Jun 2023, 6:18 pm by Tom Smith
”As Justice Clarence Thomas explains in a dissent joined by Justice Neil Gorsuch, “it seems likely that ‘the bounds of ordinary judicial review’ will be a forgiving standard in practice,” swelling courts with election lawsuits that will be “quickly resolved with generic statements of deference to the state courts. [read post]
The Right Coast - https://rightcoast.typepad.com/rightcoast/
Don’t Count on the Gorsuch and Thomas Votes in Future Voting Cases; Expect Them to Side Against Voting Rights Litigants
27 Jun 2023, 5:42 pm by Rick Hasen
(Justice Alito… Continue reading The post Don’t Count on the Gorsuch and Thomas Votes in Future Voting Cases; Expect Them to Side Against Voting Rights Litigants appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
Election Law - http://electionlawblog.org/
[Eugene Volokh] S. Ct. Decides: "True Threats" Exception Requires Showing that Speaker Was "Reckless," i.e.,
27 Jun 2023, 2:14 pm by Eugene Volokh
Justice Barrett, joined by Justice Thomas, would have opted for what is basically a negligence standard (again, oversimplifying slightly). [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Court upholds state corporate registration law in major personal jurisdiction case
27 Jun 2023, 1:33 pm by Amy Howe
Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote for a five-justice majority that included Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Sonia Sotomayor, and Ketanji Brown Jackson. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
By a 6-3 vote, the Supreme Court holds that a federal prisoner who has already filed (and exhausted) a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 can’t file another postconviction motion to raise a claim of legal innocence based on an intervening statutory-interpretation-decision of  the Supreme Court.  Section 2255(h) bars second or successive 2255 motions based on non-constitutional claims; and the “saving clause” of § 2255(e) doesn’t authorize a petition for a “writ of habeas corpus,” under § 2241, for claims barred by § 2255(h). Jones v. Hendrix, Sup. Ct.  21-857, __U.S.. __  (June 22, 2023).
27 Jun 2023, 12:31 pm by Darrell Fields
Thomas, J. [read post]
Federal Defenders of New York Blog - http://blog.federaldefendersny.org/