Search for: "Williams v. Justice Court" Results 3781 - 3800 of 5,968
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2022, 4:16 am by SHG
Five of the seven justices in the Roe majority — all except William O. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 6:45 pm by Nate Russell
 Not so certain there, William (or Francis!). [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 7:52 pm by John Bellinger
         Four former State Department Legal Advisers (Davis Robinson, Abe Sofaer, William H. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:01 am by WSLL
Summary of Decision May 24, 2013 Justice Hill delivered the opinion for the Court. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 5:46 pm by Howard Knopf
Naturally, having made winning arguments in these two cases in the Federal Court of Appeal (See here and here) and notwithstanding the unusually outspoken views of the former Chair of the Copyright Board, Justice William Vancise, I would characterize the result rather differently. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At Law360 (subscription required), retired state-court judge George Eskin urges the justices to review Lacaze v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 12:16 pm by Erin Miller
Well, only four days after the Court decided Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 8:08 pm
Attorneys, a few Supreme Court justices and many federal judges. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 3:49 am
  A few years back in Georgia v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:15 am by John Elwood
The court called for the record, indicating at least one of the justices is taking a close look at the case. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 10:56 am by fjhinojosa
Beyer’s treatise Texas Practice Series: Marital Property and Homesteads was cited by the Fort Worth Court of Appeals in its opinion in Touponse v. [read post]
 Senator Mike Crapo used his time to review her decision in mock arguments for a moot court at William and Mary School of Law. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 10:23 pm
The upshot -- states can sue, but effectively can't be sued.Consider how wikipedia describes the Florida Prepaid case: the court held - in a decision authored by Chief Justice William Rehnquist - that the [Patent] Act's abrogation of States' sovereign immunity was invalid. [read post]