Search for: "Williams v. United States" Results 3781 - 3800 of 6,551
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2015, 2:54 pm by Ronald Mann
The United States (as an amicus) weighs in to support the contractor. [read post]
26 Jul 2008, 6:37 pm
Funk    On Remand from the United States Supreme Court 08a0265a.062008/07/22 Justin Parsons v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 9:29 pm
United States, No 04-41196 (5th Cir., Oct. 11, 2006), the court held that a private-to-private transfer for economic development that was accomplished as part of a "carefully considered development plan" passed muster. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 4:30 am by Ray Dowd
DOWD, Copyright Litigation Handbook § 9.9 (2d ed.2013).Williams v Black Entertainment Tel., Inc., 2014 Copr L Dec P 30566 [EDNY Feb. 14, 2014]The Court does find it telling, however, that Woolcott has not submitted photographs displaying both sides of The Woolcott Residence. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Similarly, Justice William Johnson adhered to a “federalism of the tripartite contract” in the South Carolina federal circuit case, Elkins v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 2:56 am by Amy Howe
In her column for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse weighs in on the four-four tie in United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 7:30 am by Graham Webster
The legal point that building on another state’s continental shelf violates UNCLOS (to which, it is always worth noting, the United States is not a party) is arguably very important but strategically secondary. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 8:57 am by Eugene Volokh
Ohio (speech urging illegal activity protected unless it’s intended to and likely to cause imminent illegal activity) with United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 5:35 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
The three-judge panel there held that, in light of the Supreme Court’s decision last summer in United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 5:22 am by William Ford
Alan Rozenshtein flagged a forthcoming article he wrote for the Yale Law Journal Forum arguing that the Supreme Court was wrong to conclude that the government needed a warrant to collect large quantities of cell-phone location data in United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: For The New York Times, Timothy Williams reports that a pending ruling in Ramos v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 9:43 am by Andrew Koppelman
States, however, have had different criteria for who can marry since the founding of the United States. [read post]