Search for: "Bills v. State"
Results 3801 - 3820
of 19,726
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
This amendment set out New York State's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 9:01 pm
Last week the Supreme Court heard oral argument in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n (NYSR&P) v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 9:01 pm
Last week the Supreme Court heard oral argument in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n (NYSR&P) v. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 7:57 am
Plaintiff’s medical bills exceeded $175,000. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 1:01 pm
In early 2012, a Ninth Circuit en banc panel in United States v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 11:38 am
In Cline v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 9:11 am
" Here is the full text: In connection with the post-trial litigation in United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 9:11 am
" Here is the full text: In connection with the post-trial litigation in United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 6:23 am
With the Court’s winter recess underway, commentators continue their discussion of last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
A bill recently introduced in the California Senate SB 128, the so-called “The End of Life Option Act,” would make California the fifth state. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 9:07 pm
Unlike Summers v. [read post]
3 Mar 2018, 6:00 am
She spent time advocating the Minnesota State legislature for a bill that would guarantee new mothers a 48 hour hospital stay at least and eventually this exact bill was made a federal policy. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 1:29 pm
The Draft Bill would be enforced by the FTC, and violations treated as unfair or deceptive trade practices under the Federal Trade Commission Act, as well as by state attorneys general. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 8:33 am
Given the Gallagher et al. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 8:33 am
Given the Gallagher et al. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 6:10 am
Time billed and value should be synonymous, but that must not be the starting assumption, the court held. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 8:11 am
Furman v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 1:15 pm
Alvarez v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 8:30 pm
Healy v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 3:39 pm
Corfield v. [read post]
