Search for: "Brown v. United States" Results 3801 - 3820 of 4,104
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2020, 3:17 am by Deb Givens
Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306, 319 (2003) (crediting administrator testimony emphasizing “educational experience” that occurs “both inside and outside the classroom”). [2] See United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 8:46 pm
The panel concluded that Board members are inferior officers of the United States within the meaning of the Appointments Clause; and thus properly appointed by the SEC. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 4:42 am by SHG
Then again, if the government could ignore unpopular Supreme Court rulings, what would have come of Brown v. [read post]
As former Justice Benjamin Curtis, who dissented in Dred Scott v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm by The Legal Blog
"[The following article includes a table which lists out the statutorily permissible uses of polygraph examination in the different state jurisdictions of the United States of America: Henry T. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 5:05 am by Jim Sedor
Here’s Why That Won’t Happen.Center for Public Integrity – Sarah Kleiner | Published: 8/31/2017 Seizing on the specter of Russian election influence, Democrats have ramped up their quixotic effort to blunt Citizens United v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
4 Dec 2024, 1:06 pm by Amy Howe
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson drew questioning back to the fundamental role of the court’s authority on equal protection, invoking Loving v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 2:22 pm
  The EAJA provided that a party prevailing against the United States could get attorney's fees unless the position of the United States was "substantially justified. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Legal Beagle
”Latest Court of Session opinion on Heather Capital, published 28 February 2017: EXTRA DIVISION, INNER HOUSE, COURT OF SESSION[2017] CSIH 19 CA207/14 and CA208/14 Lady Paton Lady Clark of Calton Lord Glennie OPINION OF LADY PATON in the cause HEATHER CAPITAL LIMITED (in liquidation) and PAUL DUFFY (as liquidator) Pursuer and Reclaimer against LEVY & McRAE and others Defenders and Respondents and HEATHER CAPITAL LIMITED (in liquidation) and PAUL DUFFY (as liquidator) Pursuer… [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm by Beck, et al.
Microsoft Corp., 309 F.3d 193, 202 (4th Cir. 2002) (“allegations must be stated in terms that are neither vague nor conclusory’”); Browning v. [read post]