Search for: "California State Bar Court"
Results 3801 - 3820
of 11,181
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2010, 10:12 am
The Superior Court granted the petition, the employees appealed, and the Court of Appeal reversed.The Court first determined whether to apply Federal or California law, which incorporate different standards for vacating arbitration awards. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 5:23 am
JMBM's Special Assets Team has represented hundreds of lenders in California and throughout the United States. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 1:44 pm
For example, just this year, disciplinary charges were filed by the State Bar of California against a former L.A. [read post]
22 May 2022, 12:25 pm
The decision of the California Supreme Court makes it clear that the PruneYard may restrict expressive activity by adopting time, place, and manner regulations that will minimize any interference with its commercial functions…. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm
Superior Court of California, Orange County 13-956Issue: Whether the California Court of Appeal erred when it deepened an acknowledged circuit split and held—contrary to this Court's decisions in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 2:50 pm
Even after that setback, state officials returned to the Court with a new appeal, complaining that the lower court had not paid attention to suggestions by the Supreme Court in 2011 that the state be given some leeway. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 11:09 pm
” Relying on the California Court, the Arizona Supreme Court stated, “We find the reasoning of Howard compelling. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 3:39 am
The Department continues to administratively prosecute those who engage in such fraud and to work in collaboration with the California State Bar, the Federal Trade Commission, and federal, State and local criminal law enforcement authorities to bring such frauds to justice. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 12:00 pm
The State Bar of Texas, the Texas Access to Justice Commission, the American Bar Association, and others proudly support National Pro Bono Celebration Week (October 21-27). [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 3:51 pm
On July 27, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, threw out claims that Maker’s Mark violated California’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL) and False Advertising Law (FAL), ruling that the plaintiffs did not plausibly allege a likelihood of deception. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 7:11 am
On direct appeal, the California Supreme Court unanimously held that the trial court erred as a matter of state law (and perhaps federal law – but more on that below) in denying Ayala or his counsel an opportunity to contest the state’s justifications. [read post]
28 Aug 2010, 6:14 am
Further, we shall examine state court cases (such as Varnum v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 9:55 am
” State law claims are normally barred under Section 230, a law has enabled decades of innovation and online expression. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 11:11 am
However, Kruger was rated “exceptionally well qualified” by the California state bar group responsible for evaluating judicial nominees, and in December 2014 she was confirmed by the Commission on Judicial Appointments, a three-member body that holds a hearing to consider and decide whether to confirm nominees to the state’s highest courts. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 1:52 pm
Simply stated: “[a] collateral attack is not a substitute for an appeal” reasoned the Second Appellate District Court in Bowman v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 4:02 pm
Indeed, in this case, with Shell having no arranger liability, B&B's insolvency, and the Railroads having only 9% liability, EPA and the State of California are left to pay 91% of the cleanup costs unless they can find additional PRPs. [read post]
10 May 2010, 9:00 pm
The court also found that due to the recurring nature of the lawyer’s misconduct, the bankruptcy court needed to take immediate action to protect the public, rather than waiting for the State Bar to take action. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 1:30 pm
The Regents case was no exception, and the California court came absolutely to the correct conclusion: No harm, no foul. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm
Hodges, that: The Constitution . . . does not permit the State to bar same-sex couples from marriage on the same terms as accorded to couples of the opposite sex. . . . [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 8:00 am
The specific question before the Court is whether the Court of Indian Offenses of Ute Mountain Ute Agency is a federal agency such that Merle Denezpi’s conviction in that court barred his subsequent prosecution in a United States District Court for a crime arising out of the same incident? [read post]
