Search for: "Defendant Doe 2" Results 3801 - 3820 of 40,567
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2008, 12:52 pm
  The court affirmed the district court's dismissal for failure to state a claim, stating that, "Vertical expansion by a monopolist, without more, does not violate section 2 of the Sherman Act. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 10:46 am
For publication opinions today (2): Herbert Smith, Jr. and Charles Zacek v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 12:54 pm by emagraken
 About 2 years prior to trial the Defendant offered to settle for $50,000. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 3:19 pm by Frances Drummond (AU)
Telstra Corporation Limited [2016] FCA 857. [2] In contravention of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) sch 2, ss 18, 29(1)(g), 29(1)(h), 29(1)(l) and the Olympic Insignia Act 1987 (Cth) ss 23, 28, 30(2), 36, 38. [3] Australian Olympic Committee, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 3:19 pm by Frances Drummond (AU)
Telstra Corporation Limited [2016] FCA 857. [2] In contravention of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) sch 2, ss 18, 29(1)(g), 29(1)(h), 29(1)(l) and the Olympic Insignia Act 1987 (Cth) ss 23, 28, 30(2), 36, 38. [3] Australian Olympic Committee, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 3:18 pm by Gregory B. Williams
§ 1441(b)(2) is unambiguous and [i]ts plain meaning precludes removal on the basis of in-state citizenship only when the defendant has been properly joined and served”; and (2) the interpretation permitting snap removal does not defy rationality or render the statute nonsensical or superfluous. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 6:37 am
By filing its complaint, Plaintiff has rendered its supposed need for a September trial moot. 2. [read post]
3 May 2021, 4:48 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
An order which does not decide a motion made on notice is not appealable as of right (see CPLR 5701[a][2]; Sholes v Meagher, 100 NY2d 333, 335; Deutsche Bank Natl. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 6:37 am
By filing its complaint, Plaintiff has rendered its supposed need for a September trial moot. 2. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 7:19 am by Eric Alexander
  This followed:  1) rejection of a preliminary injunction seeking to require the defendant to assist in submitting a single patient IND to FDA and then providing the drug to plaintiff at cost; 2) affirmance of that denial on appeal to the second circuit, Cacchillo v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
Defenders of Wildlife, 551 U.S. 644, 658 (2007) (noting that arbitrary and capricious standard is "deferential" to the agency). [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 11:48 am
Clips are limited to 10 minutes and most are shorter than 2 minutes. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 5:52 am by Stanley D. Baum
In this case, the plaintiff, Andrew Young ("Young"), had worked for the defendant, Cooper Cameron Corp. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 1:24 am
  The removing defendant still must show that diversity jurisdiction, as redefined by CAFA, exists.2. [read post]