Search for: "Doctor v. State"
Results 3801 - 3820
of 8,646
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2021, 5:40 am
See Star Buick v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:47 pm
In terms of potential impact, the case of Sorrell v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 12:14 pm
Carrier/Kreiner v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 3:15 am
The State of Texas, et al., Appellants, v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 3:15 am
The State of Texas, et al., Appellants, v. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 5:16 am
[iii] See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:59 pm
After stating that, in some countries, though not Britain, plasma skin tightening may only be carried out by doctors, the article continued: Our reporter had a 45-minute undercover appointment with Ms Hindley, who assured her nothing could go wrong, saying it was ‘one of the easiest treatments I have ever learnt to do’. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 7:20 am
The verdict in Hartman et al v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 7:20 am
The verdict in Hartman et al v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 2:09 am
This was because the result of the hearing would not have a substantial influence on the secretary of state’s decision whether to place the man on the list of people barred from working with children. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 8:30 am
Many states tried to weaponize the COVID-19 crisis to prohibit abortion under the guise of protecting public health, a terrifying preview of what would happen if Roe v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 5:08 am
In Grutter v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 7:30 pm
" This draconian sentence was upheld in State of Idaho v. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 5:56 pm
Case 2:04-cv-01156- GLF-MRA Document 594 Filed 10/23/09 Page 1 of 4UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION RICHARD COOEY, et al., Plaintiffs Case No. 2:04-cv-1156 JUDGE GREGORY FROST v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 1:30 pm
The CDC’s recent study in maternal healthcare states pregnancy-related deaths have increased in the last 3 years with many being preventable with reasonable changes from health providers. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 6:23 pm
As we have previously reported here, California Assembly Bill 5 (the bill) is slated to codify the California Supreme Court’s 2018 landmark decision in Dynamex Operations West v. [read post]
14 Apr 2012, 7:11 am
The style of the case is Southwestern Life Insurance Company v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 11:33 am
In a recent landmark case, Pratten v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:00 am
The plaintiff treated with several doctors from 2006 to 2009. [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 11:18 am
M’s needs stated needs are other than for a home and subsistence, are for medication prescribed by his doctor and a refrigerator in which to keep it. [read post]
