Search for: "Doe, Appeal of"
Results 3801 - 3820
of 107,978
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2023, 4:53 pm
In March 2022, the Fourth Appellate District, Division Three of the California Court of Appeal issued a decision in Estrada v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 1:18 pm
And as discussed in ICLE’s comments to the FTC proposal, and as I discuss in detail here, the paper on health-care prices does not employ a causal design, does not employ data on hospital-based services (ambulatory-care services only), and rests on both market definitions and analytical methods largely repudiated by research from staff in the FTC’s own Bureau of Economics—research undergirding the commission’s own, very successful, health-care… [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 12:49 pm
What Is California Assembly Bill 333 and What Does It Do? [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 12:31 pm
However, the addition of new language does not necessarily destroy an earlier priority date. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 11:40 am
In itself, OHA’s decision here does not shed much light on how OHA will actually analyze HUBZone eligibility issues. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 11:22 am
The court said that an individual does not need to have a perfect understanding, but must have “at least a general understanding” of their interest. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 10:31 am
The Court of Appeals has adjusted the plaintiff's burden of proof in religious discrimination, holding for the first time that the plaintiff does not have to show the government caused a substantial burden on the plaintiff's religious practices. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 8:07 am
Both requests were denied, and the case went to the Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 7:54 am
The trial court's decision was appealed directly to the Colorado Supreme Court, and we did file an amicus brief before that court. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 6:07 am
” The trial court denied the motion for a protective order, and on interlocutory appeal, that denial was affirmed. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 5:35 am
On appeal, the applicant challenged the decision on two main bases: (1) that there is not a computer program in the claimed invention, and (2) if even there is one, the exclusion does not apply to it because the program is not claimed ‘as such’ and the claim reveals a technical contribution. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 3:39 am
Appeals Bd. (2023) __Cal. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 3:36 am
(CCH) 22 (2022) (appeal filed). [3] In re Mellier’s Estate, 182 A. 388, 389 (Pa. 1936). [4] Several of the checks that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) had mistakenly conceded were not included in the father’s gross estate were excluded from it. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 3:21 am
How do you think this appeal came out? [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
While the Federal Election Campaign Act does not address the use of deceptive AI explicitly, federal campaign finance law does prohibit politicians and those working for them from posing as another campaign. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 1:42 am
This case revolved around a public mural painted on the side of a building in a law school in Vermont during the 1990s.[7] The plaintiff in this case, Sam Kerson, intended for the mural to be a tool for people to understand the tragedies of slavery and acknowledge the role of Vermont in the underground railroad.[8] However, after the murder of George Floyd, many students sent a letter to the school stating that it was insensitive despite the artist’s intentions.[9] The school covered up the… [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 11:42 pm
The party dispossessed does not need to have a legal right to possess the property and the dispossession must have occurred without their consent or court involvement. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
In a sharp 2-1 decision, the appeals court judges agreed with Jarkesy. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 9:00 pm
Judges aim to protect their decisions from potential appeals or reversals through thorough questioning. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 5:39 pm
[So a Minnesota Court of Appeals panel concluded this Summer, over a sharp dissent.] [read post]
