Search for: "Doe v. Doe"
Results 3801 - 3820
of 152,539
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2009, 8:11 pm
Olson and Edmond v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 2:50 am
A seizure does not mean being arrested, but means that a person does not feel free to leave from police presence. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 9:12 am
EnerVest v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 12:40 pm
Supreme Court's recent ruling in United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 4:29 am
" Frey v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 10:10 am
In Alvarado v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 7:59 am
In Gardner v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 1:03 pm
From Doe v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 5:08 pm
Firing an employee for having an abortion is a form of pregnancy discrimination, the Third Circuit Court of Appeal found in Doe v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 9:07 am
Firing an employee for having an abortion is a form of pregnancy discrimination, the Third Circuit Court of Appeal found in Doe v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 5:30 am
However, in Cha’are Shalom Ve Tsedek v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 6:52 am
(2) Does the dismissal have res judicata effect? [read post]
22 Aug 2021, 7:07 am
Pursuant to Brady v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 8:52 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 9:49 am
Yesterday, the First Department in People v Anonymous, 2007 NY Slip Op 07069 held that this option to be resentenced does not apply to those convicted of conspiracy to commit drug offenses. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
In contrast to removing a school official, the Commissioner of Education does not have the authority to direct the removal of a school employeeParent of Student v East Meadow UFSD, Commissioner of Education Decision 15,907The parents of a student at East Meadow UFSD asked the Commissioner to remove two school employees from their respective positions for alleged "willful misconduct and neglect of duty. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 3:30 am
Applying the faithless servant doctrine, employer does not have to pay benefits to former employees found guilty of embezzling William Floyd Union Free School Dist. v Wright, 61 AD3d 856The William Floyd Union Free School District asked Supreme Court to relieve it of its contractual obligation to provide postretirement health and dental insurance benefits to Daniel C. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 5:40 am
City of Houston v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 3:24 am
In contrast to removing a school official, the Commissioner of Education does not have the authority to direct the removal of a school employeeParent of Student v East Meadow UFSD, Commissioner of Education Decision 15,907The parents of a student at East Meadow UFSD asked the Commissioner to remove two school employees from their respective positions for alleged “willful misconduct and neglect of duty. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 12:59 pm
In UFO Chuting of Hawaii, Inc. v. [read post]
