Search for: "Good v. Good"
Results 3801 - 3820
of 76,232
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2015, 4:08 am
Male attorneys, it’s not a good idea to use the “V” word when referring to your female adversaries, and you might even be sanctioned for it. [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 5:12 pm
The Black Dog Tavern Co. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:25 am
Hackney London Borough Council v Findlay [2011] EWCA Civ 8; [2011] WLR (D) 7 “Where a court had made an order for possession against a tenant in his absence, on an application to set aside that order under CPR r 3.1 the court should take all the circumstances into account under r 3.9, where the tenant could show for the purposes of r 39.3(5) that he had acted promptly when he found out about the possession order, had a good reason for not attending the trial and had a… [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 4:07 am
NML Capital Ltd v Republic of Argentina [2010] EWCA Civ 41; [2010] WLR (D) 28 “A court had no jurisdiction to permit a claimant to serve proceedings on a foreign state unless it was satisfied that there was, at the least, a good arguable case that the defendant state was not immune from suit. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 12:18 pm
In Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 9:00 pm
- See Smith v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 3:58 am
KG Bominflot Bunkergesellschaft für Mineraloele mbH & Co v Petroplus Marketing AG (The Mercini Lady)[2010] EWCA Civ 1145; [2010] WLR (D) 259 “There was no justification for implying a term in a contract for the sale of goods that goods which were accepted as complying with specification on loading at a seaport should be capable of remaining in an acceptable condition until unloaded at the end of a voyage. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 11:06 am
The case in question is IPC Media Ltd v Media 10 Ltd [2013] EWHC 3796 (IPEC), a 6 December ruling from John Baldwin QC, sitting as a Deputy Judge in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court for England and Wales. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 11:31 am
V.A. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 8:35 am
Spy Phone Labs LLC. v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 1:09 pm
See Swint v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 5:00 pm
In, United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 11:57 am
It's a darn good argument. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 5:20 pm
– Petrobras v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:31 am
Co. of New York v. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 12:31 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 12:22 pm
The goal is to ensure that the person remains on good behavior and is not breaking the law. [read post]
10 Nov 2012, 11:49 am
The court based its decision on the Second District's 1990 decision in Blocker v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:51 am
I also can't help but wonder what reaction both groups ought to have to a case like Palmore v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 12:44 pm
Which may well be what you want to hear, and perhaps make you happy for a while, but trust me that this joy will be insubstantial compared to the feelings you'll have once you lose yet again.Get a good lawyer. [read post]
