Search for: "Grant v. Superior Court"
Results 3801 - 3820
of 6,574
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2009, 12:45 pm
Under Saffer v. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 5:17 am
Superior court affirmed, applying PA law. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 5:00 am
Taking the Middle RoadIn the case of Seber v. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 7:37 am
State v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:14 pm
An Australian law firm’s “Tips and tricks for online hearings” refers to a ruling by the Federal Court of Australia that a case with 50 witnesses that was scheduled for six weeks would proceed virtually, despite the objection of one of the parties (Capic v Ford Motor Company of Australia Limited (Adjournment)). [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 8:45 am
The Gorlick court relied extensively on the Supreme Court’s opinion in Automatic Canteen Co. of America v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 11:50 am
The Court cites S.T. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 5:17 pm
Superior Court. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 8:03 pm
Green v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 12:53 pm
The case is Dube v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 7:16 pm
"The Circuit Court noted that while Smith may have been fired for some other legitimate reason related to alcohol use, it would be improper to grant the County's motion for summary judgment without specific evidence that Smith was fired for such a reason.A related point involving summary termination pursuant to a disciplinary grievance settlement is clearly illustrated in ruling by the Appellate Division in Taylor v Cass, 505 NYS2d 929. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 1:26 pm
One year later, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 9:19 pm
Further, the Californian Superior Court ordered the respondent to turn over the shares to the appellants. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 12:43 am
Although it sounds a little bit like hearsay (or maybe just protection of confidential sources), Wage Law is reporting that some Superior Court judges, particularly in the Bay Area, believe that a "claims made" class action settlement should never be approved in a wage & hour case. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 1:07 am
A recent decision from the California Court of Appeal, Bode v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 5:31 am
The Obolenskys then appealed, principally challenging the court’s grant of injunctive relief requiring them to alter their stockade fence. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 9:00 am
The court found that in the case of Harris v. [read post]
12 May 2013, 9:39 pm
However, the California Supreme Court issued a grant/hold review on the decision in light of its grant of review in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 8:22 am
Mills v. [read post]
12 Sep 2015, 4:19 pm
Getting back to the facts in the case, the court explains that on June 25, 2014, Thomson filed a subpoena in King County Superior Court requesting from Avvo the anonymous poster’s identification. [read post]
