Search for: "Head v State" Results 3801 - 3820 of 14,738
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2019, 2:55 pm by Matthew Kahn
 Heads of these agencies shall also consider appropriate administrative actions to increase focus on AI for 2019. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
In the Intercept, Glenn Greenwald draws attention to the fact that Amazon is itself involved in the building of a surveillance state. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 3:32 pm by Eugene Volokh
At the same time, note that Judge Clifton, while a Republican appointee, voted against right-to-carry on the panel; and some Democratic-appointed judges on the Ninth Circuit endorsed an individual rights view of the Second Amendment even before D.C. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 11:12 am
 TQ Delta v Zyxel battle continues in the UK:  For those interested in some closing arguments in the latest SEP infringement/validity battle in the UK, head down to the Rolls Building end of this week for the latest stage of the TQ Delta v Zyxel litigation before Mr Justice Carr. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:00 am by Lev Sugarman
 The IHL Intern reports directly to the Deputy Head of Legal Department. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 3:32 pm by Giles Peaker
Smailes & Poyner-Smailes v Clewer Court Residents Ltd, Cardiff County Court 30 January 2019 (Unreported but copy of judgment is here). [read post]
2 Feb 2019, 4:09 am by SHG
“To excuse objectively unreasonable conduct by an attorney would be to state that one who acts ‘with an empty head and a pure heart is not responsible for the consequences. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 7:38 am by Andrew Hamm
Commentary comes from Nancy Northup, head of the Center for Reproductive Rights, which represents the providers, in an op-ed for The New York Times. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 5:36 pm by Eugene Volokh
"From yesterday's Washington Court of Appeals decision in State v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 8:14 am by Brianne Gorod
United States, the Supreme Court held that Congress may shield the heads of regulatory agencies from removal at will, and the court has reaffirmed that decision many times since then. [read post]