Search for: "IN RE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF DECISIONS"
Results 3801 - 3820
of 7,539
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2016, 5:28 am
Carvin, and his associate Yaakov Roth, knew that “the minute the 4th Circuit decision came out, we’re going to the Supreme Court. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 4:00 am
Sanford, the infamous Supreme Court decision holding that neither slaves nor their descendants could claim any rights as citizens of the country they helped to build or of any of its States – a holding reversed in the very first sentence of the 14th Amendment. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 7:40 pm
Don’t get carried away when you’re engaging in the public discourse. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 6:18 am
County lawyers appealed Thomas’ decision. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 10:02 pm
It’s time for all of us, whether you’re a family farmer, a mom trying to get by, or an elected official looking to make a positive impact for your constituents, to say enough is enough. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 5:30 am
Since the last time a state appellate court has affirmed a lower court’s transfer to tribal court, (In re Jayda L., Neb. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 12:15 pm
To sway the court’s decision and likely public opinion, too, the pipeline company claimed it feared violence from protesters was imminent because of a few vague threats posted on social media and an anonymous email. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 10:03 am
The story you’re not paying attention to but probably should: Egypt’s economic shakeup. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 7:31 am
Obama’s presumption of the regularity of public officers performing official tasks. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 6:56 am
Working secretly to avoid public knowledge and disclosure. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 8:43 am
Re-thinking intervention is surely the challenge ahead. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 6:13 am
His lecture acknowledged the main drivers for greater transparency and some of the biggest challenges facing traditional corporate governance structures, namely technology and the involvement of the public, while also highlighting some of the costs that need to be considered when re-drafting the rules. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:24 pm
That’s what makes this part of John’s post about the decision interesting: Relying on certain language in In re U.S. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:17 pm
The purpose of these requirements is to ensure that public officials and the public are aware of the environmental consequences of decisions before they are made. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:36 am
This is the second full commentary on “The New Trail of Tears” (TNToT), written by Naomi Schaefer Riley (NSR or the author). [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:26 am
And then go ahead and re-watch Fahrenheit 9/11!) [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 9:58 am
After hearing the arguments of the federal prosecutor (and presumably, your defense lawyer), the federal magistrate judge will make the decision on whether or not you get to be released back into the public, period, and if you are, then if that release is going to be conditioned on bail that they decide is proper. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 3:24 am
His second-in-command, Colonel Sandurz, says, “You’re looking at now, sir. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 9:30 pm
You’re in a position to make a difference. [read post]
4 Sep 2016, 7:09 am
(And certainly they're not going to complain if the state lets private contracts expire.) [read post]
