Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: A. C., A CHILD"
Results 3801 - 3820
of 4,774
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2010, 9:56 am
Well, it seems the voice on the recording was that of C. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 5:02 am
--The following were extended through the end of 2012: (1) the $1,000 child tax credit, the employer-provided child care tax credit and the American Opportunity Tax Credit (for education), (2) the improvements to the adoption tax credit, earned income tax credit and dependent care tax credit, (3) the employee tax exclusion, and the employer tax deduction, (in each case up to $5,250) for employer-provided educational assistance, and (4) the annual $2000 contribution limit for… [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 3:13 pm
(c) to the extent feasible, the interest granted an omitted after-born or after-adopted child under this section must be of the same character, whether equitable or legal, present or future, as that devised to the testator’s then-living children under the will. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 9:37 pm
Torres contends the photographs should have been excluded based on South Carolina Rule of Evidence 403, and the videotape recording should have been excluded based on either Rule 403 or Section 16-3-25(C)(1) of the South Carolina Code (2003). [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 11:51 am
C. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 1:35 pm
Also important is Section 512(c)(c), referred to as the “safe harbor” provision. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 12:25 pm
We are grateful to Professor Burkhard Hess (Heidelberg) for the following remarks on the German preliminary reference in case C- 491/10 PPU (Andrea Aguirre Pelz): Mutual Recognition and Fundamental Rights Case C-491/10PPU – Andrea Aguirre Pelz An important preliminary reference has recently reached the ECJ’s dockets: In the case C-491/10PPU the Higher Regional Court of Celle referred to Luxemburg the following questions: Where the judgment to be… [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 10:58 am
§ 251(1)(C)(1) (Su [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 3:22 pm
The Tryons refused to take part in the family report process (where a psychologist or social worker interviews the family to assess what is in the best interests of the child) without having their lawyer present. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 9:59 pm
The fact that Sir Anthony May rejected this line of reasoning and accepted adult health as a “consequential benefit” should come as no surprise, presumably because the Article 36 “human health” requirement cannot be parsed down into child health and adult health, as the Claimants were contending. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:00 am
Direct response, back then, was the ugly step-child to the general advertising world. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 6:45 am
It is at least as important that courts employ fair proceedings when the stakes involve a judgment providing for custody in the best interest of a child and governing a parent's future involvement in his or her child's life, dividing all of a family's assets, or determining levels of spousal and child support.... [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am
Foster.Foster, James C. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 3:23 pm
Broadly sketched, she claimed that as a seven year old child in 1941 she witnessed the Nazis seize her parents. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 9:01 pm
Jason C. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:48 pm
”“Imagine getting a B in that class as opposed to a C,” Miyake said. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 1:38 am
” (on ECJ, 14.1.2010 – C-233/08 – Milan Kyrian ./. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 2:53 pm
G.L. c. 208, § 31. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 1:08 pm
§ 204.11(c)(6). [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 1:39 am
Another interesting point is the comparison in the expected standard of welfare when comparing animals to children: is it anomalous that one can physically discipline a child but cannot use an electric collar on a pet? [read post]
