Search for: "In re: Justice v."
Results 3801 - 3820
of 18,401
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2020, 1:10 pm
These are set out in a famous Supreme Court of Canada case, namely R. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 8:36 am
” In re al-Nashiri, 791 F.3d 71, 78 (D.C. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
Benjamin EidelsonThis post offers preliminary analysis of DHS v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
More recently, in Alsawwah v Afifi, 2020 ONSC 2883, Justice Kurz held that a lawyer’s “role as advocate should often be as rational counsel not flame-throwing propagandist. [read post]
Latest Twist in the Flynn Case Highlights the Danger of Judicial Deference to Trump’s Administration
24 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
While these cases give judges a chance, as Peter Henning says, to “wax eloquent about the need for fair administration of justice under the Equal Protection Clause’s clear limit on a prosecutor’s discretion,” in the end courts have been reluctant to impose stringent requirements.Writing in the case of Newman v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 8:46 pm
Almost ten years after the Justice Reinvestment Act established a new statutory definition of absconding from probation, we’re starting to get a better sense of what behavior does and does not rise to the level of absconding. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 7:23 pm
See Chief Justice Taney, License Cases, 5 How. 504, 12 L.Ed. 256, recanting views he had pressed upon the Court as Attorney General of Maryland in Brown v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 2:55 pm
From Tuesday's Georgia Court of Appeals opinion by Judge Clyde Reese in ACLU v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 2:28 pm
See Fox v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 12:21 am
See Couch v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm
This statute was mentioned by the Court in 1988 as support for its opinion in the famous independent counsel case, Morrison v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 5:23 pm
As Justice Bedsworth says, yes, offering him five years if he pleads guilty does make sure he goes to prison, and saves us a little bit of money in prosecution costs, but "[a]ny expense saved the state by his plea would likely be re-incurred with interest if he gets out in five years and there are still bus stops. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 3:21 pm
But we’re not there yet. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 1:43 pm
What, indeed, do we think we’re doing, as a collective constitutional order, in requiring them? [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 11:12 am
“Everybody there was like, it’s alright, we’re going to be here until 7 o’clock,” he said. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 7:32 pm
In the Bostock v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 5:40 pm
D’un autre côté, cependant, la Cour internationale de Justice adopte une approche trop restrictive en matière d’intervention. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
In a decision dated February 13, 2020, Madam Justice Simpson dismissed the application for judicial review on the basis that the Applicants failed to show in their Notice of Objection that “there exists scientifically founded doubt” about the validity of Health Canada’s Re-evaluation Decision on glyphosate. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
In a decision dated February 13, 2020, Madam Justice Simpson dismissed the application for judicial review on the basis that the Applicants failed to show in their Notice of Objection that “there exists scientifically founded doubt” about the validity of Health Canada’s Re-evaluation Decision on glyphosate. [read post]
