Search for: "In re Hill"
Results 3801 - 3820
of 7,561
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2021, 8:12 am
The long-established truth is that Congress often has not institutionalized even basic practices that would improve security standards on the Hill. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 8:22 am
Arbor Hill, 522 F.3d at 190. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 8:29 am
Many lawmakers on Capitol Hill keep coming back to the same solution—blaming Section 230. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 11:09 am
According to The Hill: "Sen. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 11:34 am
If you’re a non-lawyer and are admitted after passing the exam and meeting the moral character requirements, then you’re a “patent agent” (just not a “patent lawyer”). [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 8:28 am
Hill v. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 5:29 am
And they’re 100% with us in the big fights, the ones that really count for animals. [read post]
6 May 2016, 10:50 am
They’re all corrupt. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 3:00 am
First, let there be no question whether either Judge Bates or Director Duff actually is speaking on behalf of the judiciary; they’re not. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 1:15 pm
” What followed was a meeting with the manufacturer, a re-review of the third application by a new team, a second Advisory Panel Meeting, a recommendation from the review team that the device was “not substantially equivalent to legally marketed predicates,” and notification to the manufacturer that prior clearance would be rescinded and the product re-classified to Class III (PMA). [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 6:01 am
The buzz began on the Hill: could the Administration negotiate and conclude a trade-related deal without congressional approval? [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 12:42 pm
They’re not the only litigants either, as major record labels have filed suit against Sirius XM and against Pandora as well. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 12:46 pm
DONATE TO EFF Like what you're reading? [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 10:49 am
Sometimes the status quo stamps down any new approach on Capitol Hill. [read post]
27 Feb 2016, 12:57 pm
You’re committed to privacy and security (still!) [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 7:38 am
Hill, 3d Cir. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 1:12 pm
It’s obvious the Democrats are trying to topple the president solely because they despise him, because they’ve promised since Election Day to impeach him, and because they’re afraid he will win re-election next year. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 6:57 pm
You’re committed to privacy and security (still!) [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
Florida (This publication is with the permission of its veteran-author, who maintains a copyright over the letter, so please do not re-publish without permission from his friend and lawyer, Ken Laska). [read post]
12 May 2008, 11:23 pm
"We think it would be wonderful if that were to happen, and we're going to continue to try to encourage that," Mr. [read post]
