Search for: "Jones v State"
Results 3801 - 3820
of 6,147
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2009, 1:20 pm
Jones, a "Detective with the NYPD's Fraudulent Accident Investigation Squad ... for the past 2 ½ years," stated that "[f]raud by DME suppliers against no-fault insurance companies is widespread. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 10:47 am
The Court stated that the Graham v. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 3:50 am
Case Name: Jones v. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 3:50 am
Case Name: Jones v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 5:26 pm
Jones on the U.S. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 8:48 am
Jones argued “no. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 1:00 am
The proposed panel for hand-down is Lord Reed, Lord Hodge, Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lady Arden, and Lord Leggatt. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 2:33 pm
The recent decision of the US Supreme Court in United States v Jones has brought one particular form of surveillance of suspected individuals to the fore in public debate, namely the use of global positioning surveillance (GPS). [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 10:54 pm
On April 4 and 5, the court will hear the following cases (with the issues presented as stated on the court’s website): State Building & Construction Trades Council of California, AFL-CIO v. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 1:00 am
The proposed panel for hand-down is Lord Reed, Lord Hodge, Lady Black, Lord Lloyd-Jones, and Lady Arden. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 10:18 am
People v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 4:10 pm
In the Jones Case (2012) (United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 5:09 pm
” Rulings Three rulings have been published by IPSO’s Complaints Committee this week: 03737-18 Jones v walesonline.co.uk, Clause 1 (accuracy), 2 (privacy) and 12 (discrimination), no breach after investigation. 04100-18 The Transparency Project v Mail Online, Clause 1, no breach after investigation. 04786-18 Hobson v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 1:50 am
(Fourth issue) The Supreme Court’s judgment Lord Reed, Lord Lloyd-Jones and Lord Kitchin, with whom Lord Hodge agreed, gave the majority judgment, with Lord Carnwath dissenting in part. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 11:40 am
Davis School of Law, author of How Racial Profiling in America Became the Law of the Land: United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 6:21 am
On Monday the Court denied cert. in Martinez v. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 9:39 pm
Supreme Court has already addressed the issue of GPS tracking devices in Jones v. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 9:39 pm
Supreme Court has already addressed the issue of GPS tracking devices in Jones v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 12:35 pm
A proper reading of Jones v. [read post]
