Search for: "London v. State"
Results 3801 - 3820
of 4,150
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2008, 2:20 pm
In London Borough of Islington v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 1:31 pm
Held: R (Awua) v Brent London Borough Council [1996] AC 55 suggests that where temporary accommodation is unreasonable for the person to remain in, they again become homeless. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 10:56 am
Barry v London Borough of Southwark [2008] EWCA Civ 1440 concerned an EEA national’s eligibility for social housing, via a Part VII application. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 9:56 am
What Doherty v Birmingham City Council (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government intervening) [2008] UKHL 57 actually means for a public law defence to possession claims, particularly summary possession, was the subject of London Borough of Hillingdon v Collins & Another [2008] EWHC 3016 (Admin). [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 9:20 pm
The judgment was shortly before Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17, which put paid to any such suggestion on appeal. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 10:03 am
State of Ohio Southern District of Ohio at Columbus 08a0737n.06 Heartwood v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 10:25 am
Knowsley Housing Trust v White (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government intervening); Porter v Shepherds Bush Housing Association (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government intervening); Islington London Borough Council v Honeygan-Green: [2008] UKHL 70 “On a proper construction of Part I of the Housing Act 1988 an assured tenancy subject to a [...] [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 9:45 am
Hale ; associate editors, Gail V. [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 9:35 am
City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005). [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
(The Prior Art) Ways to avoid a USPTO ethics investigation (IP Updates) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Qualcomm penalised for failure to disclose patents to standard setting organisation and for litigation misconduct in failing to produce evidence: Qualcomm Inc v Broadcom Corp (IP Law Observer) (Patently-O) (Promote the Progress) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) (Hal Wegner) (PLI) CAFC upholds judgment enjoining inventor from asserting patent against Unitronics or its… [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 11:54 pm
On ii), M submitted that the decision was unlawful, on the basis of R (S) v London Borough of Sutton [2007] EWHC 1196 (Admin) and R (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham [2008] 1 WLR. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 7:01 pm
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW, IMMIGRATION LAW Diallo v. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 4:54 pm
CIVIL PROCEDURE Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 9:49 pm
Kelly v Westminster City Council (Central London County Court 14 August 2008). [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 10:06 pm
They searched under the authority of a warrant which turned out to be unlawful - see Redknapp v City of London Police Unfortunately, the Redknapp case suggests that the warrant was granted far too readily by the court which surely ought to be a rather more robust "guardian of the gates" in these matters. [read post]
30 Nov 2008, 11:57 pm
The United States Court of Appeals just handed down a decision that confirms this position, ruling that under the Federal Arbitration Act, there is no prehearing discovery from third parties.In Life Receivables Trust v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:28 pm
(Content Agenda) MPAA effectively shuts down largest fan edit movie site (Techdirt) Final judgment: SCO owes Novell millions (plus interest) (Ars Technica) Coupons, Inc drops DMCA lawsuit against coupon hacker (Ars Technica) (Techdirt) McCain responds to Jackson Browne lawsuit (Techdirt) Judge quashes subpoenas where Boston University could not identify John Does ‘to reasonable degree of technical certainty: London Sire Records v Does 1-4 (Recording Industry vs The… [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 5:21 pm
Life Receivables Trust v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 9:00 am
Here is the abstract: The case of Hockenjos v Secretary of State... [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 10:27 am
The High Court decision in Alberta v Katanga dealt with two separate questions that are of interest. [read post]
