Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 3801 - 3820
of 4,048
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2009, 8:50 am
The Tribunal analysed the House of Lords judgment in great depth, and came to the conclusion that the judgment was inaccurate. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 3:01 am
Feelings of the kind that the aliens' beliefs and conduct give rise to must be resisted for however long it takes to ensure that they have this protection.-- James Arthur David Hope (above right), the member of the British House of Lords who goes by the nom de juge of Lord Hope of Craighead, writing last Wednesday in RB (Algeria) (FC) v Sec'y of State for the Home Dep't.In the end, the Law Lords ruled in favor of the British government in… [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 3:01 am
Feelings of the kind that the aliens' beliefs and conduct give rise to must be resisted for however long it takes to ensure that they have this protection.-- James Arthur David Hope (above right), the member of the British House of Lords who goes by the nom de juge of Lord Hope of Craighead, writing last Wednesday in RB (Algeria) (FC) v Sec'y of State for the Home Dep't.In the end, the Law Lords ruled in favor of the British government in… [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 2:22 am
RB (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; U (Algeria) v Same House of Lords “Appeals from decisions of the Special Immigration Appeals Commission were restricted to questions of law or irrationality. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 2:36 am
RB (Algeria) (FC) and another (Appellants) v Secretary of State for the Home Department OO (Jordan) (Original Respondent and Cross-appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Original Appellant and Cross-respondent) [2009] UKHL 10 (18 February 2009) Mitchell (AP) and another (Original Respondents and Cross-appellants) v Glasgow City Council (Original Appellant and Cross-respondents) (Scotland) [2009] UKHL [...] [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 10:09 am
Also (and thanks to Rosaleen Kilbane of CLP for the information), the decision in Secretary of State for the Environment Food & Rural Affairs v Meier & Ors [2008] EWCA Civ 903 is also off to the Lords. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 2:00 pm
(See State v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 1:00 pm
- For EC Member States, according to Allianz v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 8:26 am
Given that Membership of the EU is dependent upon Member States adhering to the Convention, does the UK intend to pull out of Europe or alternatively implement the ECtHR decision in Hirst v UK(No2)? [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 1:58 am
ZT (Kosovo) v Secretary of State for the Home Department House of Lords “When a claim for asylum had been rejected as clearly unfounded under section 94(2) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002, and the claimant made further submissions, the Secretary of State for the Home Department had to consider whether those further submissions created [...] [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 10:37 am
Not for the first time, Nearly Legal has drawn my attention to the case of Holmes-Moorhouse v LB Richmond upon Thames, this time as it reaches the House of Lords. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 8:18 am
In July of 2002, Ethiopian native Binyam Mohamed was taken from Pakistan to Morocco on a Gulfstream V aircraft registered with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) as N379P. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 8:16 am
The House of Lords Opinions in Holmes-Moorhouse v LB Richmond upon Thames [2009] UKHL 7 were handed down today. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 3:03 am
Z T (Kosovo) (Respondent) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) [2009] UKHL 6 (4 February 2009) Holmes-Moorhouse(FC) (Original Respondent and Cross-appellant) v London Borough of Richmond upon Thames (Original Appellants and Cross-respondents) [2009] UKHL 7 (4 February 2009) Marks and Spencer plc (Appellants) v Her Majesty's Commissioners of Customs and Excise (Respondents) [2009] UKHL [...] [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 10:55 pm
The Lord Nataraja Temple in the town of Chidambaram is an important religious pilgrimage site. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 5:01 am
Lord knows.The Seventh Circuit has now chimed in on a related issue.In Armstrong v. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 6:20 am
Tornillo and NAACP v. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 2:34 am
Regina (Black) v Secretary of State for Justice House of Lords “The provision requiring lawfulness of detention to be determined by a court was not infringed when the Secretary of State for Justice rather than the Parole Board determined whether certain long-term prisoners should be released on licence. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 8:18 am
Lord Hoffman commented:"22. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 8:15 am
Lord Justice Moore-Bick, in the leading judgment, stated:"…I should make it clear that there is nothing unreasonable in my view in entering into a simple CFA at a time when liability has been admitted provided that the parties make a proper assessment of the inevitably much reduced risk of failure. [read post]
