Search for: "Mays v. Paul" Results 3801 - 3820 of 7,411
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2012, 7:52 pm by Larry Catá Backer
Jindal Global University; Formerly Professor and Dean, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, India Enforcing Socio-Economic Rights through Public Interest Litigation: An Overview of the Indian Experience 3) Dr Leïla Choukroune, Senior Lecturer in International Economic Law, Faculty of Law, Maastricht University, The Netherlands The Paradox of Justiciability: Labour PIL in China and India Questions/Comments 6:30pm-8:30pm – Welcome Dinner hosted by the City University Law School (by… [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 8:30 am
"How Public Interest May Limit Enforcement of a Non-Compete Agreement" advises John Paul Nefflen for Burr & Forman's Non-Compete Trade Secrets Blog. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 1:13 pm
This Kat has not yet had time to peruse the judgment closely; he or one of the other Kats may yet return to it -- but he just about has has time to send a katpat to his friend Paul Stevens at Olswang LLP (who appeared for Zynga) for alerting him to this decision.A vote for IP Draughtsis a vote for Mr Pettifog ...Around the weblogs. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 7:16 am by Daniel E. Cummins
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court recently handed down a decision on November 21, 2012 in the the nursing home case of Scampone v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 6:36 am by Gritsforbreakfast
" Here's how attorney-blogger Paul Kennedy described the gist of the ruling:In State v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 2:38 am by Russell Beck
Ohio: As you may recall, in the September 2012 issue of “Trade Secret | Noncompete – Issues and Cases in the News,” I noted that, on July 25, the Ohio Supreme Court issued a decision agreeing to reconsider its May 24 Acordia of Ohio, L.L.C. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 2:15 pm by Sara Alexandre
Gucci may have won, but it’s Guess that’s jumping for joy. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 11:30 am by William A. Ruskin
If the contract at issue cannot be found, it may be difficult to assert contractual offenses and may unnecessarily expose the company to significant liability. [read post]