Search for: "P----D v. C----S" Results 3801 - 3820 of 5,628
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2013, 8:05 pm by Douglas
Ao longo da década de 1990, o STJ editou oito súmulas sobre o tema: Súmulas 6, 47, 53, 75, 78, 90, 172 e 192. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 8:05 pm by Douglas
Ao longo da década de 1990, o STJ editou oito súmulas sobre o tema: Súmulas 6, 47, 53, 75, 78, 90, 172 e 192. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 5:12 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” (Access Point Med., LLC v Mandell, 106 AD3d 40, 44 [1st Dept 2013]; see also VA Mgt., LP, 192 AD3d at 615 [stating that “[p]laintiff’s characterization of that relief as ‘disgorgement’ of [defendant’s] compensation does not convert it into a claim for equitable relief to which the six-year statute of limitations would apply” (citations omitted)].) [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 4:22 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Días posteriores, el Senado federal celebró vistas públicas donde el centro de la discusión fue la transparencia gubernamental, enmarcado en el contrato de Whitefish. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 10:03 am
A Defensoria Pública de Goiás criada em abril de 2005, só foi instalada em maio de 2011. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 9:58 am by José Guillermo
No se entiende cómo así pretenden incorporarse al proceso político, pues sus integrantes no han hecho público un pedido de arrepentimiento y de perdón, de manera que empiecen a generar confianza en torno a la promesa de una ruptura definitiva con la violencia. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 7:10 pm
 AIG agreed to make payments to the Plaintiff’s class action in the amount of $70,000,000. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 11:15 am by Russell Knight
(c) Desertion of the child for more than 3 months next preceding the commencement of the Adoption proceeding. [read post]
16 May 2020, 3:39 pm by ALBERTO HUAPAYA OLIVARES
Dentro del contexto del sistema mixto en materia de extradición  el Poder Ejecutivo, de acuerdo  a la Constitución vigente, sólo tiene una función política, más no jurisdiccional. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 2:12 pm by Arthur F. Coon
While the fact-intensive brief makes much of the alleged “unusual” features of the proposed hillside home, the bulk of it is dedicated to legal argument attempting to defend the proposition that the “unusual circumstances” language in Guidelines section 15300.2(c)’s exception to categorical exemptions does not represent a separate requirement for the exception to apply.  [read post]