Search for: "Paras v. State"
Results 3801 - 3820
of 6,122
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2012, 10:31 am
”[14] After certification, the union is the one and only party that can bargain for all employees, including those who did not vote for the certification of the union.[15] The extent of this bargaining power is noteworthy: in Falconbridge, the union was assumed to have the power to effectively waive the ESA on behalf of its employees regardless of the individual employees knowledge or consent to such a concession with potential adverse effect on the employees.[16] It is… [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 7:18 am
The government took issue with suggestions that the consent decree was either too “regulatory” in nature and therefore overbroad or too vague so that it was unenforceable.The Justice Department concluded that both opposing and supporting comments had at least one element in common: they agreed that entry of the decree likely will reduce retail prices for e-books, at least in the short term.The consent decree in U.S. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 9:52 pm
Cytosport, Inc., CCH State Unfair Trade Practices Law ¶32,500. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 3:00 pm
Beck v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 12:58 pm
Supreme Court in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 5:10 am
¶¶ 32–33. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 4:44 am
L-03-1359, 2005-Ohio-3352, ¶ 9, citing State v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 6:00 am
See LaForest v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 9:39 pm
Domino’s Pizza, LLC, CCH Business Franchise Guide ¶14,855. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 7:53 pm
" [¶ 13] L'Oreal v. eBay, Case No. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 10:33 am
Libertarian Party of Washington State v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 8:54 pm
The July 17 decision is Katz v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 1:24 pm
Ltd v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 6:30 am
Recently, the Cypriot cabinet approved a land swap between Turkish Cypriot property lying in the State of Cyprus and Greek-Cypriot owned property, lying in the island’s occupied part. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 5:36 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 7:26 pm
The decision is Organ Recovery Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 7:58 am
” (para. 587) Similarly, in Parker v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 1:39 am
First, a unanimous court in the song previews reset the law with an emphasis once again on balance and user rights: In Theberge v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:02 am
96/09 P Anheuser-Busch v Bud? [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 9:48 am
As Ben says, there is a lot to talk about with respect to al-Aulaqi v. [read post]