Search for: "People v Dollar" Results 3801 - 3820 of 4,626
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2020, 5:01 am by Eve Gaumond
” To be constitutionally valid, a limitation on freedom of expression has to be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society following the four-step test from R v. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 4:18 am by Mandelman
  As I become aware of people doing these things, I confront them and shut them down. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:16 am by Eric Goldman
Which, to me, raises the question of what is actually a greater threat to American consumers: China’s possible back-door access to TikTok data, or elected US politicians frivolously wasting taxpayer dollars on anti-TikTok censorship theater to “entertain” those taxpayers? [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
As I’ve researched this question, I’ve realized more and more that one of the keys to understanding the history is understanding how people in the 18th and 19th centuries conceived “freedom of speech” and “freedom of the press. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
All seven state ballot measures considered following the Supreme Court’s 2022 Dobbs v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 1:08 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Cooking is also gendered in its lack of intellectual property protection and rise into higher status; cooking became art, not to mention high-dollar commerce, when men (“chefs”) started to do it. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Michael Schaps
San Francisco receives over a billion dollars a year in federal funds, which it says represents about 13 percent of its budget. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 7:05 pm
The statements, widely quoted, were also tinged with irony, a large dollop of poking fun, and a bit of reaction:When asked if he thought China’s relationship with the US should be adjusted as globalisation has come under pressure, Xi said: “More than 10,000 people fly between China and the US on a daily basis, which is about 4 million [people] a year. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 2:50 pm by Howard Knopf
Anyway, it’s probably a non-starter of a suggestion, since there are very few if any people in Canada who are sufficiently expert lawyers or economists to fulfill this role and who would not already have too much baggage to carry and still be perceived as credible to all concerned.So, I expect that my fear – shared by others – that this gratuitous statutory  references to the “public interest” and a “competitive market” will become an excuse… [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm by Bill Marler
Thanks to the New York Times and Matt Richtel for “Tainted Pork, Ill Consumers and an Investigation Thwarted. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 5:34 pm by Pamela Wolf
The test, however, is nothing new — it’s based on the 1977 decision by 8th Circuit in Green v Missouri Pacific Railroad. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 7:19 am by Russell Knight
If you can’t find a few thousand dollars from your own savings or from a friend or family member, that’s a signal. [read post]