Search for: "President v. State" Results 3801 - 3820 of 22,905
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2016, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
  Furthermore, The Editors Code of Practice which states “Everyone is entitled to respect for his or her private and family life, home, health and correspondence, including digital communications”. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 8:48 pm
The United Kingdom currently permits whole life sentences but after the European Court of Human Rights judgment in Vinter v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 7:54 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Tort Law Opinions Body: AC33291 - Local 84, Theatrical Stage Employees, Moving Picture Technicians, Artists and Allied Crafts of the United States, it Territories and Canada, AFL-CIO, CLC v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 11:55 am by admin
The clause that tripped up the corporation’s owner and president was contained in the 36th paragraph of the lease agreement. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 12:21 am by Gene Takagi
” NY Times“The debate over President Trump’s fitness for office amid the House-led impeachment inquiry has put renewed scrutiny on national security officials who served in his administration to speak out, even as the president ramps up efforts to discredit the investigation as a “deep state” plot to destroy him. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 4:58 pm by Susan I. Nelson
When President Obama criticized Citizens United two years ago in his State of the Union address, at least three justices came back at him with pitchforks and shovels. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 6:59 am
Yesterday, the Court heard arguments in United States v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 12:12 pm by Matthew Kahn
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit heard oral argument today in Hawaii v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 3:36 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Economist, Steven Mazie looks at the case, along with a cert petition filed last week that involves a state-court subpoena for the president’s financial records, observing that “[e]ach case presents the Supreme Court with a separation-of-powers quandary—how to adjudicate a dispute between branches of the federal government in Trump v Mazars; and between the president and state prosecutors in Trump v… [read post]