Search for: "Sayed v. Page" Results 3801 - 3820 of 12,181
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2017, 4:17 pm by Amy Howe
The justices declined to take up the case of Peruta v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 12:51 pm by Mark Walsh
Sotomayor reads from the bench at some length from her 27-page dissent. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 3:31 am by Peter Mahler
The 54-page decision by a Minnesota state court judge in Lund v Lund, Decision, Order & Judgment, No. 27-CV-14-20058 [Minn. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 3:31 am by Peter Mahler
The 54-page decision by a Minnesota state court judge in Lund v Lund, Decision, Order & Judgment, No. 27-CV-14-20058 [Minn. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 1:31 pm by Giles Peaker
 Port of London Authority v Paul Mendoza [2017] UKUT 146 (TCC). [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 1:49 pm by Kevin
This question has been raised in United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 10:27 am by Chris Mirasola, Yishai Schwartz
  Cover Letter In a one-page letter to Mark Rumold of EFF, Rodney Patton, Senior Counsel in the Civil Division, explains that the accompanying files represent “the first batch of documents” in response to EFF’s FOIA request seeking as-of-yet-undisclosed FISC or FISC-R orders and opinions. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 5:11 am by SHG
Having written at great length about the operation of the law, Graham v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 6:33 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
(emphasis added) The agency says that additional information about PTINs or fees will be posted on the Tax Pros page of the IRS website. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 11:53 am by Steve Vladeck
I’ve already written at some length about the flawed analytical foundations of Justice Kennedy’s opinion for a 4-2 majority in Ziglar v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 10:08 am
Larry Page when he wrote the “Google Friends Newsletter”. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 3:18 pm by Marty Lederman
  The PTO’s refusal to register the mark does not prevent Simon Tam, or the Slants, from saying anything. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 5:04 am by SHG
” To fully appreciate the importance of this problem, consider Smith v. [read post]