Search for: "State v. Childs" Results 3801 - 3820 of 21,040
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2009, 8:15 pm
Much of the discussion is centering on the impact of the 2005 Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:49 am by Russ Bensing
  The subtext of the oral argument in US v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 7:09 am
  The decision came on a 7-2 vote in United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 2:18 am by Aimee Denholm
Arises out of the trial of nine men on charges involving organised child sex grooming and child prostitution in the Oxford area. [read post]
19 May 2008, 2:20 pm
Instances of "simulated" child sexual conduct - computer generated or made by young-looking adults - are not judged under the super-special First Amendment exception for child pornography, but rather under the merely special First Amendment exception for obscenity. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 2:50 am by Eric S. Solotoff
  That was the issue in the unreported (non-precedential) decision in the case of Traynor n/k/a Dallara v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 6:02 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
 The Michigan Court of Appeals ruled in a 2004 published case (People v Adams) that a defendant cannot assert a defense at trial of his or her, "inability to pay" the court-ordered child support.Accordingly, in the Likine case, the Attorney General requested trial judge John McDonald to preclude Likine from introducing any of the above facts regarding her disability and resulting lack of income from jury consideration. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 5:45 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 The Michigan Court of Appeals ruled in a 2004 published case (People v Adams) that a defendant cannot assert a defense at trial of his or her, "inability to pay" the court-ordered child support.Accordingly, in the Likine case, the Attorney General requested trial judge John McDonald to preclude Likine from introducing any of the above facts regarding her disability and resulting lack of income from jury consideration. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 1:43 pm
The Question Presented in the cert petition in Taylor v. [read post]