Search for: "State v. Miles"
Results 3801 - 3820
of 4,307
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Petitioners challenged the CEQA exemption determination by Caltrans for an Interstate 5/State Route 56 interchange project in San Diego County as part of its North Coastal Corridor (“NCC”) project to improve vehicle and railroad transportation in the 27-mile La Jolla-Oceanside Corridor. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 4:04 am
That question was recently put to the test in the case of McKesson Information Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 6:13 am
§362(b)(2)(A)(v). [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 2:13 pm
At issue in Coeur Alaska, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 4:28 pm
The state's burden of proof disappears.Which brings us to State of Ohio v. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 4:09 pm
At least one California court, in International Bd. of Boilermakers v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 12:28 am
In total, approximately 26.5 stream kilometers (km) (16.5 stream miles (mi)) are within the boundaries of the critical habitat designation. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 3:21 pm
See State v. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 7:19 am
In El Chico v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 11:47 am
Some of the same companies that own legal research databases also own court documents and other public records databases.)C) Court documents from other states: Each state has its own e-court document filing system, under construction, fully operational, county by county, free or fee-based, etc. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 2:20 pm
If it is pure and potent, it simply does not matter when or where it came from.Here is a description of the crime from the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals' decision in Trottie v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 4:25 am
Vermont is the only state that has adopted the rule; several states have either formally or informally declined to adopt or consider adoption. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 6:17 am
The lower court therefore erred in denying the employer’s motion to compel arbitration (Poublon v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Indeed, as one federal court recently stated, “the ‘crypto’ nomenclature may be of recent vintage, but the challenged transactions fall comfortably within the framework that courts have used to identify securities for nearly eighty years. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:47 pm
Today in Christeson v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:46 am
Assembly Bill 1307 AB 1307, unanimously passed by the State Legislature and signed by Governor Newsom on September 7, 2023, was crafted in response to the court ruling in Make UC a Good Neighbor v. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 12:30 pm
See Timbs v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 6:09 am
Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 11:35 am
Orcutt’s First Law states that “Before things get better, they must get much worse. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 2:12 pm
See Busch v. [read post]
