Search for: "State v. Price" Results 3801 - 3820 of 13,237
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2018, 8:02 am by John Elwood
The owners of the deposits did not seek to exploit the deposits for years, but when the price of uranium spiked during the mid-2000s, they sued to challenge the commonwealth’s mining moratorium. [read post]
18 May 2018, 6:21 am by Doug Cornelius
An April 2016 decision by the federal appeals court in Chicago in United States v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 3:00 am by Dan Carvajal
Policymakers must be careful about trying to raise the tax burden on businesses because the ultimate economic burden of these tax hikes will ultimately fall on workers through lower wages, shareholders through lower returns, or consumers through higher prices or fewer goods. [read post]
15 May 2018, 11:25 am by Ronald Collins
One of those dots is Chief Justice John Marshall’s 1809 opinion in Bank of the United States v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 7:13 pm by Eugene Volokh
For a similar recent case from the neighboring state of Lousiana, also involving criticism of a judge during an election campaign, see Bartholomew-Woods v. [read post]
12 May 2018, 9:11 am
Worth exploring the way this approach changes approaches to regulation off markets and markets pricing, supply, etc. [read post]
11 May 2018, 9:29 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
The Committee stated: "Such change will cast the burden of proving the grounds of refusal on the party against whom such relief is sought.. [read post]
8 May 2018, 10:56 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Beautified begins an ad campaign that states, “If you like Kardashian by Kim, you’ll love Beautified, with the same yummy smell but a lower price! [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:52 am by INFORRM
Evening Standard editor George Osborne has criticised the proposed Data Protection Bill stating that cost amendment provisions shifting Claimants’ legal costs to papers would be unduly onerous. [read post]
4 May 2018, 10:30 am by skelly
  And, the United States could eliminate increased federal spending on premium subsidies for higher-priced ACA exchange coverage. [read post]