Search for: "State v. R. G." Results 3801 - 3820 of 4,524
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2009, 4:03 pm by John Steele
Louisiana, the United States Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, overturned the presumption announced in Michigan v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 11:17 am by Armand Grinstajn
Here is one of them, where the Board had to get into Delaware state law. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 6:00 am by Abbott & Kindermann
 Under section 65915 subdivision (g), the maximum stated density increase mandated is 35 percent. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 4:00 am by Doug Cornelius
Supreme Court agreed to hear an appeal of the case: City of Ontario, California, et al., Petitioners v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 4:28 am
Though these limits did not significantly restrict state owned enterprises or individual investors in China's wealthier coastal regions, they imposed significant barriers for individual investors and for businesses in the less developed regions. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 6:09 am by James Morphy, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP,
The stated purpose of the CRARA was to "improve ratings quality for the protection of investors and in the public interest by fostering accountability, transparency, and competition in the credit rating agency industry. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 2:36 am
NOTE: In 2008 the Justice Policy Institute estimated what it would cost each state to implment AWA -v- What the state would lose for not implmenting AWA. 12-9-2009 National: The answer is simple, NO, states will not lose a dime for not enacting the provisions of AWA. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 1:03 pm by Greg Herman-Giddens
Louie Gohmert, R-Texas, likened the estate tax to stealing from the dead. [read post]