Search for: "State v. Register" Results 3801 - 3820 of 13,696
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2024, 1:15 am by Charlie French (Bristows)
Although the Court of Appeal stated in Ocado v AutoStore that the interest of the general public usually arises after a decision is rendered, the position was different in this case as it might be too late for Nicoventures to use the information in the EPO proceedings if access was not granted immediately. [read post]
11 May 2020, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
He reaffirmed the Court of Appeal’s finding in Campbell v MGN Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 1373 that the defendant’s state of mind is irrelevant to the tort of misuse of private information. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 11:00 am by Christopher G Sparks
Because the state can make a prima facie case of unlicensed driving despite the issuance of a RDP, the Court reasoned that officers have no duty to determine whether a driver is within the scope of his RDP before initiating a Terry stop.The Court specifically rejected the Second District case, People v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 5:36 pm by Lyle Denniston
Nike, Inc. — scope of federal judge’s authority to rule on the validity of a federally registered trademark 11 -1175 — Marx v. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 4:44 am by Jani Ihalainen
According to established EU case law, a mark needs to have distinctive character in the whole of the EU, and would fail to be registered should it not have it for a part of the EU, even one single Member State. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 7:08 am by Dan Koewler
 the vehicle was not registered in his name . . . and yet the State immediately seized the vehicle for forfeiture. [read post]